4. The main contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that petitioners, who are physically challenged persons, are being harassed by the respondent authorities by insisting upon them to move their Bunks to other places and are not considering their requests to provide proper accommodation for running their business, and have not permitted the petitioners to move their Bunks inside the parking complex. He contends that the action of the respondents in not giving an opportunity of being heard to the petitioners before disposing of their representation is in violation of principles of natural justice and so, the impugned proceedings may be set aside and the respondents may be directed to permit the petitioners to move their bunks inside open space on the northern side of the existing Bunks, adjacent to M.C.H parking complex at Abids by three feet. The contention of the learned Standing Counsel for M.C.H is that petitioners, whose licence can be terminated at any time, have been permitted to continue at the same place for more than 10 years, taking a sympathetic view that they are physically challenged persons and in view of the traffic problems, Commissioner called and explained to the petitioners that they cannot continue to have the bunks there, and asked them to select alternative spot to establish their Bunks, but petitioners are insisting on moving inside the parking complex, and thereby causing great inconvenience to the public and since the question of granting an opportunity of being heard does not arise on a representation by a licensee, non issuance of notice for personal hearing of the petitioners is of no consequence.
