Writ petition filed by two petitioners against the Director of Higher Education dismissed as infructuous on the representation that the petitioners no longer work in the respondent-college.
Dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE Dr. JUSTICE G. YETHIRAJULU
W.P.No.10777 of 1993
Dated this 11th day of November, 2005
Between:
N. Padmalatha, d/o. N. Reddeppa,
Aged about 23 years,
R/o. 1-551-A, Tagore Cottage,
B.T. College Quarters,
Madanapalle, Chittoor District, and another.
… Petitioners
and
The Director of Higher Education,
Hyderabad, and another
THE HON’BLE Dr. JUSTICE G. YETHIRAJULU
W.P.No.10777 of 1993
ORDER:
When the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the respondents represented that the petitioners are not working in the respondent-college, in which they previously worked, therefore, the writ petition became infractuous.
In the light of the said representation, the writ petition is dismissed as infractuous. No order as to costs.
Dr.G. YETHIRAJULU, J
Date: 11-11-2005
Isn
N. Padmalatha
The Director of Higher Education, Hyderabad
G. Yethirajulu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
