A writ petition questioning employment opportunities was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner had already participated in completed interviews for the relevant post, rendering the cause unsurvivable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION No. 10266 of 2001
Between:
K.Divakar
..... PETITIONER
AND
The Sr. Divisional Manger, Divisional Office, P.O., Box No.24, LIC of India, Kenndey Road, Machilipatnam,
Krishna District and another
.....RESPONDENTS
ORDER:
The counsel for the respondents submits that the cause in this writ petition does not survive in view of the fact that interviews for the post of Watchman/Liftman in the respondent Corporation have already been completed for which the petitioner was also participated.
Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
K.C. BHANU,J
Dated: 19.08.2005
Dsr
K.Divakar
The Sr. Divisional Manger, Divisional Office, P.O., Box No.24, LIC of India, Kenndey Road, Machilipatnam, Krishna District and another
K.C. Bhanu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
