Petitioners sought a writ of mandamus restraining respondents from selling specific property units pending compliance with a labour court settlement. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn by the petitioners after an alleged settlement was reached.
Writ of Mandamus withdrawn and petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE NINETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH
WRIT PETITION NO : 727 of 2003
Between:
Guntur District.
District.
..... PETITIONER(S)
AND
.....RESPONDENT(S)
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ or order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 3 and 4 not to sell the Unit No.1 i.e., Godowns of Tobacco Division, Guntur till compliance of the settlement arrived under Sec.18(1) of the Industrial Dispute Act dated 10-04-1999 and making the payments in pursuance of the orders passed in various proceedings in favour of the petitioners by the Labour Court, Guntur as annexed to the Writ Petition
Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.SATYA PRASAD Counsel for Respondents No.1, 2 and 5: G.P. for Labour. Counsel for the Respondent No.3: MR.A.KRISHNAM RAJU Counsel for ;the Respondent No. 5: None appeared.
The Court made the following :
Order:-
The learned Counsel for the Petitioners filed a letter stating that the respondents and the petitioners have arrived at a settlement subject to the withdrawal of writ petition. Hence the petitioners advised him to withdraw the writ petition. Hence the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
(V.ESWARAIAH)
9-11-2004
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to issue a writ of mandamus directing respondents not to sell the Godowns of Tobacco Division, Guntur till compliance of the settlement.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Miriyala Hari Babu
The Government of Andhra Pradesh
The District Collector, Guntur District
The Union Bank Of India
Nava Bharat Enterprises Limited
Deputy Commissioner of Labour
V.ESWARAIAH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
