Allowed¶22

State of Rajasthan v. Prakash Narain Natani Son of Late Shri Laxminarain Natani

Rajasthan HC7 Jul 2026WRES/188/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Condonation of 186-day delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act; restoration of S.B. Review Petition No.36/2020 in a pension matter (State of Rajasthan & Director, Pension Department v. Prakash Narain Natani); prior dismissal dated 09.07.2025 following peremptory order dated 02.05.2025 on substitution of legal heirs of deceased respondent; restoration allowed subject to Rs.2,000/- cost to Rajasthan High Court Bar Association, Jaipur; URN WRES / 291U / 2026; Justice Ganesh Ram Meena; decided 07/07/2026.

What did the court decide?

Restoration of S.B. Review Petition No.36/2020 to its original number, subject to payment of cost of Rs.2,000/- to the Rajasthan High Court Bar Association, Jaipur, upon submission of the receipt of deposit. ¶22

State of Rajasthan Vs Prakash Narain Natani Son of Late Shri Laxminarain Natani — Rajasthan HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:25574]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Writ Restoration Application No. 188/2026 URN: WRES / 291U / 2026

¶4

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶5

Director, Pension Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

Prakash Narain Natani Son Of Late Shri Laxminarain Natani, Aged About 84 Years, R/o 69/91 Veer Tejaji Road, Mansarover, Jaipur.

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kuldeep Singh Rathore for Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

¶12

Order

¶13

07/07/2026

¶14

An application No.329/2026 has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 186 days in filing the restoration application.

¶15

Considered the submissions made by counsel for the applicant/petitioner and the reasons mentioned in the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, the same is allowed. The delay in filing the restoration application is condoned.

¶16

This restoration application has been filed by the petitionerState for restoration of the S.B. Review Petition No.36/2020 which was dismissed vide order dated 09.07.2025 pursuant to the peremptory order dated 02.05.2025 which is in regard to filing of

[2026:RJ-JP:25574]

[WRES-188/2026]

(2 of 2)

an appropriate application for taking the legal heirs of the deceased-respondent on record.

¶21

Having regard to the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner and the averments made in the application, the Court deems just and proper to restore the review petition subject to cost of Rs.2,000/- to be paid with the Rajasthan High Court Bar Association, Jaipur.

¶22

Accordingly, the restoration application is allowed.

¶23

On submitting of receipt of depositing the cost amount, the review petition bearing S.B. Review Petition No.36/2020 is restored to its original number.

¶24

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

¶25

79/Ashish Kumar

State of Rajasthan v. Prakash Narain Natani Son of Late Shri Laxminarain Natani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

State of Rajasthan v. Prakash Narain Natani Son of Late Shri Laxminarain Natani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abhay Dhaka S/O Om Prakash Vs the State of Rajasthan

Naveen Maratha S/O Ganesh Maratha, Vs State of Rajasthan

Satya Narayan Yadav S/O Krishna Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Rajasthan

Rajlaxmi Mehta D/O Kushal Singh Mehta Vs the State of Rajasthan

Ashfaq Pathan @ Monu S/O Mohammad Ishaq Vs State of Rajasthan

Dharmpal Yadav S/O Shri Rampat Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan