Allowed¶31

Kumarr Singh Son of Shripat v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC14 May 2026SOSA/515/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

suspension of sentence; bail during pendency of appeal; SOSA-515/2026; D.B. Criminal Appeal No.490/2025; Rajasthan High Court Jaipur DB; Sections 148, 307/149 & 302/149; co-accused Rajendra and Gajraj; fire arm injury; eye witnesses; Karauli; Masalpur; Central Jail Bharatpur; District Jail Karauli; Inderjeet Singh; Bhuwan Goyal; order dated 14/05/2026; appearance on 10.07.2026; neutral citation [2026:RJ-JP:20402-DB]

What did the court decide?

Suspension of execution of the sentences awarded to the accused-applicants during the pendency of D.B. Criminal Appeal No.490/2025; accused-applicants admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the trial Court, with stipulation to appear before this Court on 10.07.2026 and thereafter as and when called upon. ¶31

Kumarr Singh Son of Shripat Vs the State of Rajasthan — Rajasthan HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶31

Issue for consideration

Whether the execution of the sentence awarded to the accused-applicants should be suspended and they released on bail during the pendency of D.B. Criminal Appeal No.490/2025.

¶23

Court's answer

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the evidence of eye witnesses according to which the allegation of causing fire arm injury is against co-accused Rajendra and Gajraj, and the fact that hearing of the appeal may take long time, the Court deemed it just and proper to allow the suspension of sentence application.

¶26

Ratio / Principle

The criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application is allowed: execution of the sentence awarded to the accused-applicants shall remain suspended during the pendency of the criminal appeal and the accused-applicants are admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before this Court on 10.07.2026 and thereafter as and when called upon.

¶31

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Suspension of sentence allowed — D.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension Of Sentence Application No. 515/2026 in D.B. Criminal Appeal No.490/2025, High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Bench at Jaipur (Justices Inderjeet Singh and Bhuwan Goyal), order dated 14/05/2026. Accused-applicants Kumarr Singh, Lekhraj, Hariom and Jogendra Singh, convicted for the offences under Sections 148, 307/149 & 302/149, obtained suspension of execution of their sentences and admission to bail for the pendency of the appeal, subject to satisfaction of the trial Court, with stipulation to appear before the Court on 10.07.2026. Grounds: eye-witness evidence placing the fire-arm injury on co-accused Rajendra and Gajraj, and the prospect of long delay in hearing the appeal. Neutral citation: [2026:RJ-JP:20402-DB].

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:20402-DB]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

D.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension Of Sentence Application No. 515/2026

¶4

¶5

D.B. Criminal Appeal No.490/2025

¶6

Kumarr Singh Son Of Shripat, Resident Of Devri, Police Station Masalpur, District Karauli, (Rajasthan) (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Bharatpur)

¶7

Lekhraj Son Of Rajendra, Resident Of Devri, Police Station Masalpur, District Karauli, (Rajasthan) (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Bharatpur)

¶8

Hariom Son Of Kamar Singh, Resident Of Devri, Police Station Masalpur, District Karauli, (Rajasthan) (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Bharatpur)

¶9

Jogendra Singh Son Of Shripat, Resident Of Devri, Police Station Masalpur, District Karauli, (Rajasthan) (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Bharatpur)

¶10

----Petitioners

¶11

Versus

¶12

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Public Prosecutor.

¶13

----Respondent

¶14

For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. V.R. Bajwa, Sr. Adv., assisted by Mr. Amar Kumar
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with
		Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma
		Mr. Mukesh Pal Jadoun, for the complainant

¶15

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL

¶16

Order

¶17

14/05/2026

¶18

This suspension of sentence application has been filed by the accused-applicants along with the appeal.

¶19

[2026:RJ-JP:20402-DB]

¶20

[SOSA-515/2026]

¶21

(2 of 3)

¶22

Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the accusedapplicants submits that the accused-applicants have been convicted for the offences under Sections 148, 307/149 & 302/149.

¶23

Learned Senior Counsel for the accused-applicants submits that the accused-applicants namely Kumarr Singh, Lekhraj & Hariom were on bail during trial and accused-applicant namely Jogendra Singh was not on bail during trial and presently, all the accused-applicants are serving their sentence in District Jail, Karauli. He further submits that the accused-applicants have been falsely implicated in this matter and according to the statement of the eye witnesses, allegation of causing fire arm injury is against co-accused persons namely Rajendra and Gajraj. He further submits that the appeal is not likely to be heard in near future and prayed that sentence awarded to the accused-applicants may be suspended and they be released on bail during the pendency of the appeal.

¶24

Learned Government Advocate-cum-Additional Advocate General assisted by learned counsel for the complainant has opposed the application for suspension of sentence.

¶25

We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

¶26

Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case, and also considering the evidence of eye witnesses, according to which, the allegation of causing fire arm injury is against coaccused persons namely Rajendra and Gajraj and the fact that hearing of appeal may take long time, we deem it just and proper

¶27

[2026:RJ-JP:20402-DB]

¶28

[SOSA-515/2026]

¶29

(3 of 3)

¶30

to allow this criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application.

¶31

In that view of the matter, this criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application is allowed and it is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to the accused-applicants shall remain suspended during the pendency of the criminal appeal and the accused-applicants be admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this Court on 10.07.2026 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so.

¶32

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax for necessary compliance.

¶33

(BHUWAN GOYAL),J

¶34

(INDERJEET SINGH),J

¶35

Upendra Pratap Singh /12

Kumarr Singh Son of Shripat v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kumarr Singh Son of Shripat v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rakesh Son of Babu Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohammad Rahim S/O Mohammad Rafiq Vs State of Rajasthan

Puran Son of Shri Kailashi Vs the State of Rajasthan

Mahesh Chand Gurjar Son of Khadkaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Wahab Mohammad Son of Abdual Hamid Vs the State of Rajasthan

Rakesh @ Rinku S/O Shri Ranglal Vs State of Rajasthan