Applicants sentenced to life imprisonment under Section 307/34 IPC sought suspension of sentence pending appeal. The court noted they were on bail during trial, no injuries were dangerous to life per PW-9 doctor, and appeal disposal would take time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2026:RJ-JP:20185-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension Of Sentence Application No. 114/2026
In
D.B. Criminal Appeal No.30/2026
----Applicants
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, Dy.GA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order
13/05/2026
[2026:RJ-JP:20185-DB]
[SOSA-114/2026]
(2 of 2)
applicants were on bail during trial and hearing/disposal of appeal is likely to take long time. Therefore, he prayed that sentence awarded to the accused-applicants may be suspended and the accused-applicants be released on bail during the pendency of the appeal.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
Anu /25
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the sentences of the accused-applicants should be suspended during the pendency of their criminal appeal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Puran Son Of Shri Kailashi
Lalluram Son Of Shri Haricharan
The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
Inderjeet Singh
Bhuwan Goyal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
