Disposed

Badri Narain Son of Gyarsi Lal Meena, v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC12 Mar 2026CW/4217/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging suspension of the petitioner's vehicle Registration Certificates. Following a Co-ordinate Bench order in a similar matter, the Court set aside the suspension, subject to the petitioner reporting to the notice-issuing authority and adjudication thereafter.

What did the court decide?

Suspension of Registration Certificates set aside; revocation effective subject to appearance before notice-issuing authority on 01.04.2026 and adjudication by competent authority within 15 days.

Badri Narain Son of Gyarsi Lal Meena, Vs State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:10476]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4217/2026

¶4

Badri Narain Son Of Gyarsi Lal Meena, Aged About 51 Years, Resident Of Village Natata, Tehsil Jamuaramgargh, Jaipur (Rajasthan). (Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj 14 Rb 8587 And Rj 14 Rb 2643)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Transport Commissioner, Transport And Road Safety Department, Parivahan Bhawan, Sahakar Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶8

Director, Department Of Mines And Geology, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶9

Regional Transport Officer-I, Rto Office Jaipur, District Jaipur (Rajasthan).

¶10

District Transport Officer-I, Dto Office Jaipur, District Jaipur (Rajasthan).

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devesh Kumar Meena Mr. Avadhesh Meena Mr. K.N. Sharma Mr. Pankaj Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG with Ms. Ritika Naruka, AAAG & Mr. Tanishq A. Parmar

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

¶14

Order

¶15

12/03/2026

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy involved in the present writ petition has already been decided by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.17894/2025 (Tofik Ahmed & Ors. Vs. State of

¶17

Rajasthan & Ors.) decided on 20.11.2025.

[2026:RJ-JP:10476]

[CW-4217/2026]

(2 of 3)

Learned counsel appearing for the respondents-State agrees and submits that the present writ may also be decided in the light of the directions passed in case of Tofik Ahmed & Ors. (supra).

¶22

Operative parts of the order dated 20.11.2025 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court are as follows :-

¶23

“6. Having heard the contentions made by the learned counsel for the parties, taking note of the material available on record in the petition, and the judgments cited at the Bar, this Court without going into the arena of disputed questions of facts and merits of the petition, is of a view that the impugned order, whereby the Registration Certificates of the vehicles owned / possessed by the petitioners are suspended, needs to be set aside, for the reasons that the said vehicles are the source of bread and butter of the petitioners and their families. However, the aforementioned revocation shall only be effective subject to a condition that the petitioners along with their counsel concerned shall report to / before the notice issuing authorities, on 05.12.2025, preferably in-between 11:00 am to 01:00 pm. Thereafter, due reply be filed within a period of 15 days.

¶24

Audience with respect to the same will be provided by competent authority on 20.12.2025. Adjudication of the same be carried out thereafter within a period of 15 days.

¶25

It is made clear that during the period of consideration of grievances, the RCs of the vehicles owned/ possessed by the petitioners, which are suspended, shall be revoked and the status of the vehicle in furtherance to the consequential proceedings as registered and entered upon the official portal concerned, shall be updated, without further ado.

¶26

It is made clear that no prejudice will be caused to either side on account of passing of the present order.

(3 of 3)

[2026:RJ-JP:10476]

[CW-4217/2026]

In the light of the same, the present writ petition stands disposed of with the aforementioned directions being granted. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.”

¶31

Accordingly, in view of the directions given in case of Tofik Ahmed & Ors. (supra), the present writ petition also stands disposed off as under:-

¶32

(i) The impugned order whereby, the Registration Certificate of the vehicles owned/possessed by the petitioners are suspended, is set aside for the reason that the said vehicles are the source of bread and butter of the petitioners and their family. The aforesaid revocation shall only be effective subject to a condition that the petitioners alongwith their counsel concerned shall report to/before the notice issuing authority on 01.04.2026 preferably in between 11:00 AM to 01:00 PM and submit the explanation.

¶33

(ii) Audience with respect to the same will be provided by competent authority and adjudication of the same be carried out thereafter within a period of 15 days.

¶34

Stay application as well as pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.

¶35

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

¶36

Ashish Kumar /29

Badri Narain Son of Gyarsi Lal Meena, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Badri Narain Son of Gyarsi Lal Meena, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil S/O Shri Udayveer Vs State of Rajasthan

Kartar S/O Shri Parti Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhuttu S/O Daulat Vs State of Rajasthan

Chitranjan Meena S/O Shri D.R. Meena Vs State Public Information Officer Cum Deputy Secretary

Imperial School of Nursing Vs the State of Rajasthan

Navjeevan Nursing College Vs the State of Rajasthan