Disposed

Kartar S/O Shri Parti v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC10 Mar 2026CW/4500/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ganesh Ram Meena disposed of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4500/2026 by following the directions of a co-ordinate bench. The impugned order suspending registration certificates was set aside, subject to a condition for the petitioners to report to the Notice Issuing Authority on 19.03.2026 to submit an explanation. Pending applications were also disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Set aside suspension of Registration Certificates; direct petitioners to report to Notice Issuing Authority on 19.03.2026 to submit explanation; adjudicate within 15 days.

Kartar S/O Shri Parti Vs State of Rajasthan — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:10202]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4500/2026

¶4

Kartar S/o Shri Parti, Aged About 38 Years, R/o 12, Attu Majra, Ambala, (Haryana), Owner Of Truck Bearing Number Hr-37F-7671.

¶5

Surender S/o Shri Dharmveer, R/o House No.62, Village Majri Ambala, (Haryana), Owner Of Truck Bearing Number Hr-37F-5615.

¶6

Rocky S/o Shri Ravindr, R/o 801, Gaongothara, Mohabtabad, Pali (13), Faridabad, (Haryana), Owner Of Truck Bearing Number Hr-38Ah-3873, Hr-38Aj-9700.

¶7

Nand Ram S/o Shri Sant Ram, R/o Gm Bad, (13), Faridabad, (Haryana), Owner Of Truck Bearing Number Hr-38Aj-6481.

¶8

----Petitioners

¶9

Versus

¶10

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Transport Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶11

The Joint Secretary,mines And Geology Department, Secretrait, Jaipur,rajasthan,

¶12

Regional Transport Officer, Bharatpur. 4. Regional Transport Officer, Alwar. 5. District Transport Officer, Kotputali, District Kotputali Behror.

¶13

Regional Transport Officer, Sikar. 7. Regional Transport Officer, Jaipur First.

¶14

Regional Transport Officer, Jaipur-Ii.

¶15

Regional Transport Officer, Ajmer.

¶16

District Transport Officer, Kekari.

¶17

District Transport Officer, Beawar District Ajmer.

¶18

District Transport Officer, Jhunjhunu.

¶19

----Respondents

¶20

For Petitioner(s)

¶21

: Ms. Priyanka Paliwal, for Mr. Raj Kumar Goyal

¶22

[CW-4500/2026]

¶23

[2026:RJ-JP:10202]	(2 of 4) [CW-4
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Sachin Singh Rathore, AAAG, Mr. Anshuman Singh, for Mr. S.S. Naruka,AAG

¶24

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

¶25

Order

¶26

10/03/2026

¶27

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the controversy involved in the present writ petition, has already been decided by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ

¶28

Petition No.17894/2025 (Tofik Ahmed & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) decided on 20.11.2025.

¶29

The learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State agrees and submits that the present writ petition may also be decided in the light of the directions passed in case of Tofik Ahmed & Ors. (supra).

¶30

Operative parts of the order dated 20.11.2025, passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in case of Tofik Ahmed & Ors. (supra), are as follows :-

¶31

“6. Having heard the contentions made by the learned counsel for the parties, taking note of the material available on record in the petition, and the judgments cited at the Bar, this Court without going into the arena of disputed questions of facts and merits of the petition, is of a view that the impugned order, whereby the Registration Certificates of the vehicles owned / possessed by the petitioners are suspended, needs to be set aside, for the reasons that the said vehicles are the source of bread and butter of the petitioners and their families. However, the aforementioned revocation shall only be effective subject to a condition that the petitioners along with their counsel concerned shall report to / before the notice issuing authorities, on 05.12.2025,

(3 of 4)

[2026:RJ-JP:10202]

[CW-4500/2026]

preferably in-between 11:00 am to 01:00 pm. Thereafter, due reply be filed within a period of 15 days.

¶36

Audience with respect to the same will be provided by competent authority on 20.12.2025. Adjudication of the same be carried out thereafter within a period of 15 days.

¶37

It is made clear that during the period of consideration of grievances, the RCs of the vehicles owned/ possessed by the petitioners, which are suspended, shall be revoked and the status of the vehicle in furtherance to the consequential proceedings as registered and entered upon the official portal concerned, shall be updated, without further ado.

¶38

It is made clear that no prejudice will be caused to either side on account of passing of the present order.

¶39

In the light of the same, the present writ petition stands disposed of with the aforementioned directions being granted. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.”

¶40

Accordingly, in view of the directions given in case of Tofik Ahmed & Ors. (supra), the present writ petition also stands disposed off as under:-

¶41

(i) The impugned order whereby, the Registration Certificate of the vehicles owned/possessed by the petitioners were suspended, is set aside for the reason that the said vehicles are the source of bread and butter of the petitioners and their family. The aforesaid revocation shall only be effective subject to a condition that the petitioners along with their counsel concerned shall report to/before the Notice Issuing Authority on 19.03.2026 preferably in between 11:00 AM to 01:00 PM and shall submit their explanation.

(4 of 4)

[2026:RJ-JP:10202]

[CW-4500/2026]

(ii) Audience with respect to the same will be provided by competent authority and adjudication of the same be carried out thereafter within a period of 15 days.

¶46

Stay application as well as pending application, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶47

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

¶48

SHRUTI SHARMA /22

Kartar S/O Shri Parti v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kartar S/O Shri Parti v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahesh Kumar Dhancholia Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Rafiq S/O Shri Deenu Vs State of Rajasthan

Gulab Chand Yadav S/O Nathu Ram Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Anil S/O Shri Udayveer Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhuttu S/O Daulat Vs State of Rajasthan

Ihita D/O Hitesh Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan