Disposed¶19

Afsana Bano D/O Suleman Gouri v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC3 Jul 2026CW/16306/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Rajasthan HC Jaipur; S.B. Civil Writ Petition 14600/2025 (connected 16306/2025); Prachi Maderna & Afsana Bano v. State of Rajasthan; B.ed. internship salary release; compliance with orders dated 03.05.2019 and 30.08.2022; representation to Competent Authority within 15 days; reasoned and speaking order; bar on recovery till representation decided; writ petitions disposed of; Ganesh Ram Meena, J.; order dated 03/07/2026.

What did the court decide?

Writ petitions disposed of with liberty to file comprehensive representation to the Competent Authority within 15 days; Competent Authority directed to consider it and pass a reasoned and speaking order in light of the orders dated 03.05.2019 and 30.08.2022; no recovery for B.ed. internship payments till disposal of the representation; liberty to pursue further legal remedies. ¶19

Afsana Bano D/O Suleman Gouri Vs the State of Rajasthan — Rajasthan HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶19

Issue for consideration

Whether the respondents are bound to comply with the orders dated 03.05.2019 and 30.08.2022 as regards release of salary to the petitioners for the period they were undergoing B.ed. internship. +1 more

¶17

Court's answer

Both writ petitions are disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to make a comprehensive representation to the Competent Authority raising the grievances as in the writ petition, within a period of 15 days.

¶19

Ratio / Principle

If such a representation is preferred within 15 days, the Competent Authority shall consider it and pass an appropriate reasoned and speaking order dealing with the grievances of the petitioners in light of the orders referred in the prayer clause.

¶23

Key takeaways

The respondent authority shall not make any recovery for the payment made to the petitioners for the B.ed. internship period till disposal of the representation.ratio¶24
The petitioners remain free to avail the appropriate remedy available under law if aggrieved by any decision taken on their representation.ratio¶25

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench (Ganesh Ram Meena, J.), by order dated 03/07/2026 disposed of two connected writ petitions (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14600/2025 - Prachi Maderna, connected with No. 16306/2025 - Afsana Bano) versus the State of Rajasthan, which sought compliance with orders dated 03.05.2019 and 30.08.2022 for release of salary for the period the petitioners underwent B.ed. internship. Finding that ends of justice would be met by a representation-based remedy, the Court disposed of the petitions with liberty to file a comprehensive representation to the Competent Authority within 15 days; directed the Competent Authority to consider it and pass a reasoned and speaking order in light of the orders referred in the prayer clause; restrained the respondent authority from making any recovery of payments made for the B.ed. internship period till disposal of the representation; and left the petitioners free to avail appropriate legal remedies against any decision on the representation.

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14600/2025 URN: CW / 33028U / 2025

¶3

Prachi Maderna D/o Lavkush, W/o Mahesh Chand

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Rajasthan

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

Connected With

¶9

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16306/2025 URN: CW / 37133U / 2025

¶10

Afsana Bano D/o Suleman Gouri

¶11

----Petitioner

¶12

Versus The State Of Rajasthan For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Partap Saini For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Joshi with Ms. Deepa Singh

¶13

----Respondent

¶14

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

¶15

Order

¶16

03/07/2026

¶17

By filing of both these petitions, the petitioners have prayed for the respondents to comply with the order dated 03.05.2019 and 30.08.2022, as regards release of salary in favour of the petitioners for the period they were undergoing B.ed. internship.

¶18

After having heard the case for some length, the Court feels that ends of justice would meet if the petitioners are permitted to make comprehensive representation against their grievances to the Competent Authority.

¶19

Accordingly, the both the writ petitions are disposed of with a liberty to the petitioners to make comprehensive representation to

¶20

(2 of 2)

¶21

[CW-14600/2025]

¶22

the Competent Authority as raised in the present writ petition within a period of 15 days.

¶23

In case, any such representation is preferred by the petitioners to the Competent Authority within a period of 15 days, the Competent Authority shall consider it and pass an appropriate reasoned and speaking order dealing with the grievances of the petitioners in light of the orders referred in the prayer clause.

¶24

The respondent authority shall not make any recovery for the payment made to the petitioners for the period they were undergoing B.ed. internship till disposal of the representation.

¶25

The petitioners would be free to avail the appropriate remedy available to them under law if they are aggrieved by any decision on their representation.

¶26

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

¶27

10-11/RACHNA

Afsana Bano D/O Suleman Gouri v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Afsana Bano D/O Suleman Gouri v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Kailash Meena S/O Ram Kishore Meena Vs the State of Rajasthan

Pankaj Singh Son of Shri Rajendra Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Dharmesh Singh S/O. Chatur Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Chetan Kumar Jain S/O Shri Prem Chand Jain Vs State of Rajasthan

Purushotam Verma Son of Shri Satyanarayan Verma Vs State of Rajasthan

Suresh Kumar Sharma S/O Shri Ramsahay Sharma Vs the State of Rajasthan