Allowed¶25

Rajendra Kumar S/O Shri Banwari Lal, v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC9 Mar 2026CRLMP/897/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Quashment of FIR on compromise; petition under Section 528 BNSS; offences under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 340(2), 329(3), 61(2)(b) BNS 2023; FIR No.38/2025, PS Jaipur Airport, Jaipur City (East); reliance on Gian Singh (2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934) and State of Haryana v. Choudhary Bhajan Lal (AIR 1992 SC 604); Rajasthan High Court Jaipur Bench; Justice Anil Kumar Upman; decided 09/03/2026; petition allowed, FIR quashed and set aside.

What did the court decide?

FIR No.38/2025 registered at Police Station Jaipur Airport, District Jaipur City (East) quashed and set aside on the basis of compromise; stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. ¶25

Rajendra Kumar S/O Shri Banwari Lal, Vs State of… — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶25

Issue for consideration

Whether FIR No.38/2025 registered at Police Station Jaipur Airport, District Jaipur City (East), for offences under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 340(2), 329(3) and 61(2)(b) of BNS, 2023, could be quashed on the basis of the compromise arrived at between the accused-petitioners and the complainant.

¶17

Court's answer

The Court held that, the parties having settled their dispute amicably and the complainant having no objection, the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by the Supreme Court in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and State of Haryana v. Choudhary Bhajan Lal, and as such the FIR is liable to be quashed in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties.

¶24

Ratio / Principle

The criminal misc. petition under Section 528 BNSS was allowed and FIR No.38/2025 registered at Police Station Jaipur Airport, District Jaipur City (East) was quashed and set aside, with consequences to follow.

¶25

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 897/2026, High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur (Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Upman), decided 09/03/2026. Three accused-petitioners moved under Section 528 of BNSS to quash FIR No.38/2025, Police Station Jaipur Airport, District Jaipur City (East), registered for offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 340(2), 329(3) and 61(2)(b) of BNS, 2023, on the basis of a written compromise; parties appeared in person and the complainant raised no objection. Finding the case wholly covered by the Supreme Court's principles in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab & Anr. (2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934) and State of Haryana & Ors. v. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. (AIR 1992 SC 604), the Court allowed the petition, quashed and set aside the FIR, and disposed of the stay and pending applications.

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:10118]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 897/2026

¶4

1. Rajendra Kumar S/o Shri Banwari Lal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Plot No. 23-K-5, C-Scheme, Chand Bihari Nagar, Near Lal Mandir, Khatipura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶5

1. Smt. Reena Kanwar W/o Shri Vikas Singh, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Village Panchpahadi (Hapud), Tehsil Kotputali, Pachhodala, Jaipur.

¶6

Vikas Singh S/o Shri Sawai Singh, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Plot No. 08, Shiv Vihar, Niwaru Road, Masarampura, Jhotwara, Jaipur.

¶7

----Accused-Petitioners

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

Vijay Kumar Ucchainiya S/o Shri Moti Lal Ucchainiya, Aged About 45 Years, R/o 217, Roy Colony, Hasanpura-C, Jaipur, Rajasthan

¶12

----Complainant/Respondent

¶13

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Arvind Balaut,Adv.
For Respondent(s)	: Ms. Arti Sharma, PP with
	Mr. VijaySingh Yadav,PP

¶14

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN

¶15

Order

¶16

09/03/2026

¶17

By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.38/2025 registered at Police Station Jaipur Airport, District Jaipur City (East) for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 340(2), 329(3) and 61(2)(b) of BNS, 2023, on the basis of compromise.

¶18

Parties are present in person. They have duly been identified by their respective counsel.

[2026:RJ-JP:10118]

[CRLMP-897/2026]

(2 of 2)

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that parties have settled their dispute amicably. It is further submitted that due to compromise, further proceedings in the aforesaid FIR are fruitless. The written compromise has been annexed with this petition.

¶23

Learned counsel for complainant submits that complainant has no objection if the present misc. petition is allowed.

¶24

In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [ AIR 1992 SC 604 ] and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties.

¶25

In view of the above, this criminal misc. petition is allowed and the FIR No.38/2025 registered at Police Station Jaipur Airport, District Jaipur City (East) is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow.

¶26

Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

¶27

(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J

¶28

MADAN/100

Rajendra Kumar S/O Shri Banwari Lal, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajendra Kumar S/O Shri Banwari Lal, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhawani Shankar Purohit S/O Shri Jhumar Mal, Vs State of Rajasthan

Komal Jatav Daughter of Shri Vijendra, Vs State of Rajasthan

Nanag Ram Mahawar, Son of Shri Jai Ram, Vs State of Rajasthan

Vikram Alias Vicky S/O Shri Gulab Chand Meena, Vs State of Rajasthan

Monu Tourist Service Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Sapna Daughter of Shri Aajad, Wife of Shri Rahul, Vs State of Rajasthan