Allowed¶39

Vikram Alias Vicky S/O Shri Gulab Chand Meena, v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC9 Mar 2026CRLMP/513/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Quashing of FIR on basis of compromise/settlement between parties; inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS; FIR No.455/2025, PS Sanganer, Jaipur City (East); offences under Sections 115(2), 127(2), 140(3) of BNS 2023; complainant no objection; Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab, 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934; State of Haryana Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal, AIR 1992 SC 604; S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1253/2026 connected with No. 513/2026; Justice Anil Kumar Upman; decided 09/03/2026; [2026:RJ-JP:10119].

What did the court decide?

Quashing of FIR No.455/2025 registered at Police Station Sanganer, District Jaipur City (East); stay applications and pending application(s), if any, disposed of. ¶39

Vikram Alias Vicky S/O Shri Gulab Chand Meena, Vs State of Rajasthan — Rajasthan HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Quashing of FIR No.455/2025 registered at Police Station Sanganer, District Jaipur City (East); stay applications and pending application(s), if any, disposed of.

¶39

Issue for consideration

Whether the FIR No.455/2025 registered at Police Station Sanganer, District Jaipur City (East) for offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 127(2) and 140(3) of BNS, 2023 is liable to be quashed on the basis of the compromise arrived at between the parties.

¶30

Court's answer

Finding that the parties had resolved their dispute amicably and that the case was wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by the Supreme Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and in State of Haryana Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal, the Court held that the FIR was liable to be quashed in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties.

¶38

Ratio / Principle

Both criminal miscellaneous petitions were allowed and FIR No.455/2025 registered at Police Station Sanganer, District Jaipur City (East) was quashed and set aside, with consequences to follow; stay applications and pending applications stood disposed of.

¶39

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench), by a single bench of Justice Anil Kumar Upman (order dated 09/03/2026 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) Nos. 1253/2026 and connected 513/2026), allowed two petitions under Section 528 of BNSS filed by accused persons and quashed FIR No.455/2025 of Police Station Sanganer, District Jaipur City (East), registered for offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 127(2) and 140(3) of BNS, 2023, on the basis of an amicable compromise between the accused-petitioners and the complainant Lekhraj. The Court found the case wholly covered by the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. (2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934) and State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. (AIR 1992 SC 604); the complainant had raised no objection. Stay applications and pending applications were disposed of.

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:10119]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1253/2026

¶4

Golu Meena Son Of Shri Charat Lal Meena, Aged About 21 Years, Resident Of Village Banediya, Police Station Chauth Ka Barwada, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj).

¶5

Jugraj @ Jugnu Meena Son Of Shri Kalu Ram Meena, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Village Jagmonda, Police Station Chauth Ka Barwara, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj).

¶6

Monu Meena Son Of Shri Chiranji Lal Meena, Aged About 21 Years, Resident Of Village Nindarda, Banota, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj).

¶7

Dilkhush Bairwa Son Of Shri Ramdayal Bairwa, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Village Gunsheela, Ward No. 9, Tehsil Chauth Ka Barwada, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj).

¶8

----Accused-Petitioners

¶9

Versus

¶10

The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶11

----Respondent

¶12

Lekhraj Son Of Shri Shambhudayal, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Village Gunsheela, Police Station Chauth Ka Barwada, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj). At Present Resident Of Tirupati Balaji Nagar, Bairwa Colony, Sanganer, Jaipur (Raj).

¶13

----Complainant/Respondent

¶14

Connected With

¶15

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 513/2026

¶16

Vikram Alias Vicky S/o Shri Gulab Chand Meena, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Bagina, Tehsil And Police Station Chauth Ka Barwara, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan.

¶17

----Accused-Petitioner

¶18

Versus

¶19

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.

¶20

---Respondent

¶21

Lekhraj S/o Shri Shambhudayal, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Village Gunshila, Police Station Chauth Ka

¶22

(2 of 3) [CRLMP-1253/2026]

¶23

[2026:RJ-JP:10119]

¶24

Barwara, District Sawai Madhopur, Currently Resident Of Tripati Nagar, Bairwa Colony, Sanganer, Jaipur (Rajasthan).

¶25

----Complainant/Respondent

¶26

For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. Kamal Kumar Gupta, Adv., with Mr. Anmol Dhankar,Adv.
For Respondent(s)	:	Ms. Arti Sharma, PP with Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP and
		Mr. Nishant Sharma, Adv., for
		complainant.

¶27

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN

¶28

Order

¶29

09/03/2026

¶30

By way of these criminal misc. petitions under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.455/2025 registered at Police Station Sanganer, District Jaipur City (East) for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 127(2) and 140(3) of BNS, 2023, on the basis of compromise.

¶31

Parties are present in person. They have duly been identified by their respective counsel.

¶32

Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that parties have settled their dispute amicably. It is further submitted that due to compromise, further proceedings in the aforesaid FIR are fruitless. The written compromise has been annexed with this petition.

¶33

Learned counsel for complainant submits that complainant has no objection if the present misc. petitions are allowed.

¶34

In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made

[CRLMP-1253/2026]

[2026:RJ-JP:10119]

(3 of 3)

available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [ AIR 1992 SC 604 ] and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties.

¶39

In view of the above, these criminal misc. petitions are allowed and the FIR No.455/2025 registered at Police Station Sanganer, District Jaipur City (East) is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow.

¶40

Stay applications and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

¶41

(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J

¶42

MADAN/119-120

Vikram Alias Vicky S/O Shri Gulab Chand Meena, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikram Alias Vicky S/O Shri Gulab Chand Meena, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhawani Shankar Purohit S/O Shri Jhumar Mal, Vs State of Rajasthan

Komal Jatav Daughter of Shri Vijendra, Vs State of Rajasthan

Nanag Ram Mahawar, Son of Shri Jai Ram, Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajendra Kumar S/O Shri Banwari Lal, Vs State of Rajasthan

Monu Tourist Service Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Sapna Daughter of Shri Aajad, Wife of Shri Rahul, Vs State of Rajasthan