Dismissed¶20

Anil Kumar S/O Subhash Chand v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC3 Jul 2026CRLMB/9374/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench; CRLMB-9374/2026 (URN CRLMB/17247U/2026); Anil Kumar v. State of Rajasthan; bail under Section 483 BNSS; offence under Section 7A of the Prevention of Corruption Act; FIR No.145/2026, Police Station C.P.S. Jaipur, ACB District; applicant a private person, in custody since 29.05.2026; bail application dismissed as matter still at investigation stage; liberty to renew bail prayer after investigation and charge-sheet; single-judge order of Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand dated 03/07/2026.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to renew the prayer for bail after completion of investigation as well as submission of the charge-sheet; bail itself refused. ¶20

Anil Kumar S/O Subhash Chand Vs State of Rajasthan — Corruption | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:24670]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.9374/2026 URN: CRLMB / 17247U / 2026

¶4

Anil Kumar S/o Subhash Chand, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village Dilapur, Police Than Mandlera, District Jhujhunu, Presently Residing At Plot No.43, Ratan Sagar Colony, Isckon Road, Police Thana Patrakar Colony, Mansarover, Jaipur, Presently Proprietor Dynamic Manpower And Security Services, Jaipur.

¶5

(At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur.)

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through	Versus Public Prosecuto
For Petitioner(s) : Mr.	Anirudh Tyagi
For Respondent(s) : Mr.	N.S. Dhakar,PP

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND

¶11

Order

¶12

03/07/2026

¶13

The instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been filed by the applicant in connection with the FIR No.145/2026 registered at the Police Station C.P.S. Jaipur, ACB District, wherein he is charged for offence punishable under Section 7A of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

¶14

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is not a government servant, he is a private person. Learned counsel submits that he has been falsely booked in the instant case and he is in custody since 29.05.2026. He further submits that the trial will take its own time to conclude, so indulgence of bail be granted to the applicant.

[2026:RJ-JP:24670]

[CRLMB-9374/2026]

(2 of 2)

Per contra , learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application and submitted that the matter is still at the investigation stage. Hence, the applicant does not deserve indulgence of bail.

¶19

Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on record.

¶20

Considering the arguments put forward by learned Public Prosecutor and looking to the fact that since the matter is still at the stage of investigation, this Court is not inclined to entertain the instant bail application. Accordingly, the instant bail application stands dismissed.

¶21

However, the applicant would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after completion of investigation as well as submission of the charge-sheet.

¶22

(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J

¶23

2/Karan-Aayush

Anil Kumar S/O Subhash Chand v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Kumar S/O Subhash Chand v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishan Avatar Gupta S/O Shri Kalyan Sahay Gupta Vs the State of Rajasthan

Aalam S/O Liyakat Ali Vs State of Rajasthan

Ms. Kajal Meena S/O Shri Kamar Singh Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Asha Devi W/O Hitendra Pal Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Vs Vinod Kumar Saini S/O Shri Hanuman Parasad Saini

Sanjay Kumar Bhedi S/O Heeralal Vs State of Rajasthan