Allowed

Dilkhush S/O Netaram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC19 Jan 2026CRLMB/854/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Rajasthan Techaiqulikia grants bail to the accused in a criminal conviction matter involving murder and cheating offenses, where the bail conditions were technically violated but the accused is hospitalized awaiting treatment. The court upheld the principles of justice and compassion.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted to the petitioner (Dilkhush) in the technical violation of bail conditions, considering his hospitalization and the broader circumstances of the case.

Dilkhush S/O Netaram Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:2190]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 854/2026

¶4

Dilkhush S/o Netaram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Ramgopal Ka Mohalla, Ramnagar, P.s. Datwas, District Tonk (At Present Confined In District Jail Sawaimadhopur).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohar Pal Meena, Adv. through V.C. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, PP through V.C.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶11

Judgment / Order

¶12

19/01/2026

¶13

izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= ch-,u-,l-,l- dh /kkjk 483 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk&eykjukMwaxj] lokbZek/kksiqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&272@2025 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 318¼4½] 319¼2½] 338] 336¼3½] 340¼2½] 112¼2½ ch-,u-,l- rFkk /kkjk 66D, 13 lwpuk izkS|ksfxdh vf/kfu;e] 1949 esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA

¶14

fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr us rdZ fn;k fd vfHk;qDr funksZ"k gS] mls feF;k :i ls vkfyIr fd;k x;k gS] vfHk;qDr fnukad 27-10-2025 ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] ckn vuqla/kku vkjksi i= is'k gks pqdk gS] fopkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vr% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶15

blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk ;g tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

[2026:RJ-JP:2190]

[CRLMB-854/2026]

(2 of 2)

nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶20

vfHk;qDr dk izFke tekur vkosnu vkjksi i= izLrqfr ds mijkar uohu tekur vkosnu is'k djus dh Lora=rk ds lkFk okfil fy;s tkus ds vk/kkj ij [kkfjt fd;k x;k Fkk] vc vuqla/kku gksdj vkjksi i= is'k gks pqdk gSA orZeku ekeys esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) lkbZcj ÝkWM djus dk vkjksi gS] vfHk;qDr fnukad 27-10-2025 ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] fopkj.k esa le; yxsxkA

¶21

vr% izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izLrqr rdksaZ ,oa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vfHkj{kk vof/k dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶22

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr fny[kq'k iq= usrkjke dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; ;k varfjrh U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk cU/k&i= rFkk ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`< izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr dj izekf.kr djkos rks gLrxr izdj.k esa mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A

¶23

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶24

DINESH KUMAWAT /37

Dilkhush S/O Netaram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dilkhush S/O Netaram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Banti Singh S/O Shri Jagveer Vs State of Rajasthan

Balram S/O Shri Banwari Lal Vs Universal Sompo General Insurance Company Ltd.

Abdul Kadir S/O Kayamuddin Vs State of Rajasthan

Manoj S/O Ratanlal Vs State of Rajasthan

Shyam S/O Bhampu Vs State of Rajasthan

Amit Kumar S/O Rammehar Vs the State of Rajasthan