Held a petitioner to be entitled to bail in a Section 120-B and 420 CrPC case. The petitioner was under trial since September 11, 2025, had no prior trial applications, and the court noted inadequate trial progress.
Bail granted to the petitioner with a condition to ensure availability at the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2026:RJ-JP:2062]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 16714/2025
Amit Kumar S/o Rammehar, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Kethal, P.s. Ramala, District Bagpath, Uttar Pradesh. (Accused Is Confined At District Jail Sawai Madhopur).
----Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Manish K. Sharma,Adv. through V.C. |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP through V.C. |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order
19/01/2026
izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= ch-,u-,l-,l- dh /kkjk 483 ¼/kkjk 439 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk½ ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk&ekuVkÅu] lokbZek/kksiqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&248@2024 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 420] 467] 468] 471] 120&B Hkk-na-la- esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA
fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr us rdZ fn;k fd vfHk;qDr funksZ"k gS] mls feF;k :i ls vkfyIr fd;k x;k gS] vfHk;qDr fnukad 11-09-2025 ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] vfHk;qDr dk izFke tekur vkosnu vkjksi i= izLrqfr ds mijkar uohu tekur vkosnu is'k djus dh Lora=rk ds lkFk okfil fy;s tkus ds vk/kkj ij [kkfjt fd;k x;k Fkk] dfFkr dwVjfpr vkns'k vfHk;qDr }kjk rS;kj dj mls mi;ksx esa fy;k x;k gks] bl ckcr~ i=koyh ij dksbZ lkexzh ugha gS] ,d lkekU; vkijkf/kd izdj.k ds vykok vfHk;qDr dk dksbZ vkijkf/kd fjdkWMZ ugha gS] ckn vuqla/kku vkjksi i= is'k gks pqdk
[2026:RJ-JP:2062]
[CRLMB-16714/2025]
(2 of 2)
gS] fopkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vr% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk ;g tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;kA
orZeku ekeys esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) fuykeh dh dk;Zokgh ds laca/k esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds vkns'k dh dwVjpuk dh tkuk@djok;s tkus dk vkjksi gS] vkns'k dh fØ;kfUofr gqbZ gks] ,slh fLFkfr Hkh ugha gSA vfHk;qDr fnukad 11-09-2025 ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] egRoiw.kZ vuqla/kku gksdj vkjksi i= is'k gks pqdk gS] fopkj.k esa le; yxsxkA
vr% izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izLrqr rdksaZ ,oa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vfHkj{kk vof/k dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr vfer dqekj iq= jkeesgj dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; ;k varfjrh U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk cU/k&i= rFkk ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`< izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr dj izekf.kr djkos rks gLrxr izdj.k esa mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
DINESH KUMAWAT /05
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, accused in a Section 120-B and 420 CrPC case, is deserving of bail considering his trial delay and lack of prior bail applications.
Amit Kumar
The State Of Rajasthan
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
