Yashpal @ Piyush @ Pannu S/O Shri Anoop Kumar Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

[2026:RJ-JP:12141]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 847/2026

Yashpal @ Piyush @ Pannu S/o Shri Anoop Kumar Meena, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Seva, P.s. Wazirpur, District Sawai Madhopur. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dausa).

¶5

---Accused-Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 848/2026

¶11

Dilkhush Meena S/o Indraj Meena, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Dholipal Tan Kharra, Police Station Mandawari, District Dausa. (At Present Confined In District Jail Dausa, District Dausa).

¶12

Dilraj @ Dholya Meena S/o Indraj Meena, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Dholipal Tan Kharra, Police Station Mandawari, District Dausa. (At Present Confined In District Jail Dausa, District Dausa).

¶13

---Accused-Petitioners

¶14

Versus

¶15

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶16

----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1323/2026 Abhishek Meena S/o Ramnaresh Meena, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Kohli Prempura, Police Station Bamanwas, District Sawai Madhopur. (At Present Confined In District Jail Dausa, District Dausa).

¶17

---Accused-Petitioner

¶18

Versus

¶19

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶20

----Respondent

¶21

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Poonam Chand Sharma Mr. Siddhant Jain for Ms. Anju Meena Mr. Ravindra Kumar Paliwal

¶22

[2026:RJ-JP:12141]

¶23

[CRLMB-847/2026]

¶24

2026:RJ-JP:12141]		(2 of 3)
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Mr.	Vivek Sharma, PP Amitabh Jatav with
	Ms.	Ambika Jatav

¶25

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

¶26

Order

¶27

23/03/2026

¶28

The instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of the accused-applicants. The accusedapplicants were arrested in connection with FIR No. 141/2025 registered at Police Station Mandavri District Dausa for the offence(s) under Sections 103(1), 61(2) of BNS, 2023.

¶29

Learned counsel for the accused-applicants submits that the applicants are young persons, aged between 18-20 years. It is submitted that charge-sheet has already been filed and the trial will take its own time to conclude. It is further submitted that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the applicants and that the applicants are young students. It is also submitted the applicant, namely Yashpal, is not even named in the FIR and has been falsely implicated as an afterthought at a later stage of investigation. It is next submitted that the motive and the controversy involved in the instant matter pertains to the applicants, namely Dilkhush Meena and Dilraj, and that the applicants, namely Yashpal and Abhishek, had no motive whatsoever towards commission of the alleged offence. Qua the applicant-Dilkhush Meena, it is submitted that he has no criminal antecedents.

¶30

Per contra , learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the instant bail

[2026:RJ-JP:12141]

[CRLMB-847/2026]

(3 of 3)

applications and have submitted that the allegations of heinous offence have been levelled against the applicants and that the injury report and the medical opinion dated 16.10.2025 reflect dozens of injuries including multiple fractures qua the victimdeceased, and that the medical opinion is consistent with the cause of death being attributable to the said injuries. It is further submitted that the motive on the part of the applicants, namely Dilkhush Meena and Dilraj, who are real brothers, stemmed from the alleged illicit relationship of the victim-deceased with the wife of the applicant, namely Dilraj. It is also submitted that recoveries including a wooden stick, a mobile phone, and an iron rod have been effected qua the applicants. It is lastly submitted that the applicants, namely Abhishek and Yashpal arrived at the place of occurrence of offence on a motorcycle, which has also been recovered in furtherance of the prosecution’s case.

¶35

Heard and considered. 5. Considering the overall facts and circumstances, taking note of the fact that that the allegations of heinous offence have been levelled against the applicants; that the cause of death being attributable to the inflicted injuries; that prima facie, there exist motive towards commission of the said offence on part of the applicants, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances but without commenting upon merits/demerits of the case, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the accused-applicants on bail.

¶36

Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are dismissed.

¶37

(SAMEER JAIN),J

¶38

DEEPAK/56-58

Yashpal @ Piyush @ Pannu S/O Shri Anoop Kumar Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yashpal @ Piyush @ Pannu S/O Shri Anoop Kumar Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajkumar S/O Ranveer Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Vishnu S/O Harveer Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajkumar S/O Sohan Lal, Vs State of Rajasthan

Rewantaram S/O Shri Ummedram Vs State of Rajasthan

Mursalim Urf Mursaleen S/O Shri Subedar Vs State of Rajasthan

Vikram Son of Batti Lal Vs State of Rajasthan