Allowed

Vikram Son of Batti Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC23 Mar 2026CRLMB/1588/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application under Section 483 BNSS for offences under Sections 318(4), 319(2) BNS 2023, Section 13 R.P.G.O. and Sections 66-C, 66-D I.T. Act. Court noted applicant's young age, filing of charge-sheet and custody since December 2025, allowed bail with bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Applicant enlarged on bail on personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each.

Vikram Son of Batti Lal Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:12159]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1588/2026

¶4

Vikram Son Of Batti Lal, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Jadawta Ki Dhani Hindupura, Tehsil Bonli, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan). (At Present Confined In District Jail, Sawai Madhopur).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

¶11

Order

¶12

23/03/2026

¶13

The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of the accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 100/2025 registered at Police Station Bonli, District Sawai Madhopur for the offence(s) under Sections 319(2), 318(4) BNS 2023, Section 13 R.P.G.O. and Section 66-C, 66-D I.T. Act and the learned Trial Court amidst the offences under Sections 318(4), 319(2) BNS 2023, Section 13 R.P.G.O. and Section 66-C, 66-D I.T. Act dismissed the bail application before it.

¶14

Learned counsel for the applicant-accused submits that the applicant is a young person, aged about 23 years. It is submitted that charge-sheet in the instant matter has already been filed. It is further submitted that applicant-accused is behind bars since

(2 of 2)

[2026:RJ-JP:12159]

[CRLMB-1588/2026]

22.12.2025. It is also submitted that there are two criminal antecedents registered against the accused-applicant.

¶19

Per contra , learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the present bail application.

¶20

Heard and considered.

¶21

Considering the overall facts and taking note of the fact that the applicant is a young person, aged about 23 years; that charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter; that the applicant is behind bars since 22.12.2025, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances, but without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail.

¶22

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Vikram S/o Batti Lal shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶23

(SAMEER JAIN),J

¶24

RINCHU /67

Vikram Son of Batti Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikram Son of Batti Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajkumar S/O Ranveer Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Vishnu S/O Harveer Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajkumar S/O Sohan Lal, Vs State of Rajasthan

Rewantaram S/O Shri Ummedram Vs State of Rajasthan

Mursalim Urf Mursaleen S/O Shri Subedar Vs State of Rajasthan

Yashpal @ Piyush @ Pannu S/O Shri Anoop Kumar Meena Vs State of Rajasthan