Nadeem S/O Akhtar v. State of Rajasthan
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application allowed under Section 483 BNSS 2023; cyber fraud F.I.R. No.145/2026 P.S. Kama District Deeg; offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) BNS 2023 and Section 66D Information Technology (Amendment) Act 2008; bail earlier rejected by Additional Sessions Judge, Kama on 23.04.2026 (Misc. Bail Appn. No.575/2026); no criminal antecedents; challan filed; offences triable by Magistrate; petitioners in custody since 05.04.2026; personal bond Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties Rs.50,000 each; conditions include no travel abroad without permission and prosecution liberty to seek cancellation of bail upon involvement in future cyber fraud; single judge BIPIN GUPTA; decision date 06/07/2026; petitioners Nadeem S/o Akhtar and Musraf S/o Hifjul; connected application S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6717/2026.
What did the court decide?
Release of both accused-petitioners (Nadeem S/o Akhtar and Musraf S/o Hifjul) on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- each with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, appearing before it on all dates of hearing until completion of trial, subject to conditions: (i) not to leave the country without the permission of the Court; (ii) not to commit any similar offence; (iii) not to make any inducement, threat or promise to dissuade disclosure of facts or tamper with evidence; (iv) in the event of involvement in any other cyber fraud case in the future, the prosecution is at liberty to move the learned trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted.