Allowed

Goru Nath S/O Amar Nath Adopted S/O Jagdish Nath v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 Jul 2026CRLMB/9708/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application under Section 483 BNSS against rejection of bail by the trial court in FIR involving BNS offences. Court granted bail noting the parties' compromise, complainant's no-objection, and that offences are triable by a Magistrate.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs.50,000 each, subject to conditions of appearing at trial, not leaving country without permission, and not tampering

Goru Nath S/O Amar Nath Adopted S/O Jagdish Nath Vs State… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:25130]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9708/2026 URN: CRLMB / 17967U / 2026

¶4

Goru Nath S/o Amar Nath Adopted S/o Jagdish Nath, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Nehru Nagar, Kalyanipura, P.s. Alwar Gate, District Ajmer. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devanshu Sharma, For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, AGA Mr. Govind Upadhyay

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA

¶11

Judgment / Order

¶12

06/07/2026

¶13

The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 06.06.2026 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge No.4, Ajmer, in Bail Application No.655/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.101/2026, Police Station Gegal, Ajmer, for the offences under Sections 189(2), 140(3), 115(2), 127(2), 119(1), 352, 133, 303(2) BNS of 2023.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the he has been falsely implicated in the case. Learned counsel Mr. Govind Upadhyay appears as counsel for the complainant/victim and submits that the parties have entered into a compromise and

[2026:RJ-JP:25130]

[CRLMB-9708/2026]

(2 of 3)

complainant/victim has no objection if the bail is granted to the petitioner.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the conclusion of investigation/trial will take sufficiently long time and even the offences are triable by a Magistrate. He, therefore, prays that the petitioner may also be enlarged on bail, particularly in view of the fact that he has been in judicial custody since 17.05.2026.

¶20

Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application.

¶21

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate, learned counsel for complainant/victim and perused the material available on record. 6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced that the offences are triable by Magistrate; the parties have entered into a compromise and complainant/victim has no objection if the bail is granted to the petitioner, therefore, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.

¶22

Consequently, the bail application is allowed . It is ordered that the accused-petitioner - Goru Nath S/o Amar Nath Adopted S/o Jagdish Nath arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.101/2026, Police Station Gegal, Ajmer, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of

(3 of 3)

[2026:RJ-JP:25130]

[CRLMB-9708/2026]

hearing and as and when called upon to do so till the completion

¶27

of the trial and with additional following conditions:

¶28

(i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court;

¶29

(ii) The petitioner shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected; and

¶30

(iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶31

(BIPIN GUPTA),J

¶32

106/JUBIN

Goru Nath S/O Amar Nath Adopted S/O Jagdish Nath v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Goru Nath S/O Amar Nath Adopted S/O Jagdish Nath v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shahrukh S/O Ismial Vs State of Rajasthan

Lukman S/O Raseed Vs State of Rajasthan

Rahil S/O Ibrahim Vs State of Rajasthan

Kaushal Kishore Chandrul Son of Shri Om Prakash Chandrul Vs State of Rajasthan

Aabid S/O Majid Vs State of Rajasthan

Shayari W/O Late Kamnath Vs State of Rajasthan