Rahil S/O Ibrahim Vs State of Rajasthan

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:24825]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6155/2026 URN: CRLMB / 10993U / 2026

¶4

Rahil S/o Ibrahim, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Khairwa Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

¶5

Farhan S/o Sahabdeen, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Malhaka Police Station Pahari, District Deeg Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

Connected With

¶11

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6156/2026 URN: CRLMB / 10994U / 2026

¶12

Mohammad Kaif S/o Alisher, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Alampur, Police Station Pahari, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (Presently Accused Confined In Central Jail Deeg).

¶13

----Petitioner

¶14

Versus

¶15

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

¶16

----Respondent

¶17

Connected With

¶18

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6159/2026 URN: CRLMB / 10997U / 2026

¶19

Shahrukh S/o Ismial, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Aalampur Police Station Pahari, District Deeg (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

¶20

Rihan S/o Ummar, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Aalampur Police Station Pahari, District Deeg (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

¶21

----Petitioners

¶22

Versus

¶23

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶24

----Respondent

¶25

[2026:RJ-JP:24825]	(2 of 4)	[CRLMB-6155/2026]
For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Liyakat Khan Mr. Rahul Agrawal Mr. SanjayKhan
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Naresh Gupta, P.P., Mr. Yogendra Singh, CI, Pahadi,District Deeg	S.H.O.

¶26

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA

¶27

Judgment / Order

¶28

03/07/2026

¶29

The present bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 10.04.2026 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kama, District Deeg in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.518/2026, 516/2026, and 517/2026 respectively whereby the bail applications of the petitioners were rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.59/2026, Police Station Pahadi, District Deeg for the offences under Sections 319(2) 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2)(A) of the BNS, 2023, and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2000.

¶30

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners of having committed any offence of similar nature or any other nature and only five complaint against the present petitioners have been registered on the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal, and the total amount involved is approximately Rs.1,54,025/-.

¶31

Learned counsel for the petitioners further submit that challan in the case has already been filed and the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time and even the offences are triable by the Magistrate, therefore, he prays that the petitioners

[2026:RJ-JP:24825]

[CRLMB-6155/2026]

(3 of 4)

may be enlarged on bail as the accused are in custody since 06.03.2026.

¶36

Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application.

¶37

In compliance of the order dated 30.06.2026, the Investigating Officer is also present before the Court and submits that there are no criminal antecedents against the accusedpetitioners of having committed any offence of similar nature or any other nature.

¶38

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 7. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon consideration of the submissions advanced, and particularly the fact that challan has been filed; all the offences are triable by Magistrate; the conclusion of investigation/trial is likely to take a considerable time; there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners of having committed any offence of similar nature or any other nature, this Court is of the opinion that the bail applications deserves to be accepted.

¶39

Consequently, the bail applications are allowed . It is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely (i) Rahil S/o Ibrahim, (ii) Farhan S/o Sahabdeen, (iii) Mohammad Kaif S/o Alisher (iv) Shahrukh S/o Ismial (v) Rihan S/o Ummar

¶40

arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.59/2026, Police Station Pahadi, District Deeg, shall be released on bail; provided each of them furnish a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation

(4 of 4)

[2026:RJ-JP:24825]

[CRLMB-6155/2026]

that they shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions:

¶45

(i) The petitioners shall not leave country without the permission of the Court;

¶46

(ii) The petitioners shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which they are accused, or suspected, of the commission of which they are suspected;

¶47

(iii) The petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; and

¶48

(iv) In the event the petitioners are found involved in any other cyber fraud case in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein.

¶49

(BIPIN GUPTA),J

¶50

128-130/KRATIKA

Rahil S/O Ibrahim v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahil S/O Ibrahim v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nazim S/O Hanif Vs State of Rajasthan

Mijaj @ Mujjam S/O Islam Vs State of Rajasthan

Ammar S/O Abdul Mazid Vs State of Rajasthan

Shahrukh S/O Ismial Vs State of Rajasthan

Lukman S/O Raseed Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohammad Kaif S/O Alisher Vs State of Rajasthan