Allowed

Hariram S/O Khanaram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC12 May 2026CRLMB/6614/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application for offences under BNS Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2) and 110. Injuries alleged simple or non-vital; petitioner in custody since April 2026 with no criminal past and prolonged trial expected. Bail allowed on personal bond with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of the trial court.

Hariram S/O Khanaram Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:19979]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6614/2026

¶4

Hariram S/o Khanaram, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Charnet, Police Station Ghad, District Tonk, Rajasthan. (Presently Confined In District Jail At Tonk).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶8

	----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sogarwal Ms. Priya Doodi
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari,PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR

¶10

Order

¶11

12/05/2026

¶12

The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.34/2026 registered at Police Station Ghar, District Tonk for offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2) and 110 of B.N.S., 2023.

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He has further submitted that the petitioner has also lodged an F.I.R. against the complainant. Though there is allegation of causing injuries to the complainant but as per material available on record, injury alleged to be caused on the right partial region is simple in nature and is on the right hand though grievous in nature however, not on vital part of the body. He again submitted that petitioner is behind the

[2026:RJ-JP:19979]

[CRLMB-6614/2026]

(2 of 2)

bars since 16.04.2026 without any criminal past. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently the bail application deserves to be allowed.

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶19

On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.

¶20

Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Hariram S/o Khanaram, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.

¶21

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶22

RACHNA / 47

Hariram S/O Khanaram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hariram S/O Khanaram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rahul Gurjar Son of Shri Rajesh Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohar Singh @ Mor Singh Son of Shri Goru @ Garu Vs the State of Rajasthan

Rahul Raav S/O Kaluram Raav Vs the State of Rajasthan

Satish S/O Bhambho @ Mukesh Vs the State of Rajasthan

Kanhaiya S/O Shri Banwari Vs State of Rajasthan

Tarachand Bawriya S/O Sh. Shankarlal Bawriya Vs the State of Rajasthan