Sikandar S/O Shri Shokeen Vs the State of Rajasthan

The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.220/2024 registered at Police Station Ramganj (Ajmer), District Ajmer for offences under Sections 323, 342, 365, 386 and 34 of IPC, 1860.

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that in the present matter, compromise has been arrived at between the parties. He also submits that co-accused Iqbal Khan has been released on bail by this Court on 06.03.2026 and co-accused Salman has also got benefit of bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 04.08.2025. Other co-accused Hamid also got benefit of bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order

[2026:RJ-JP:18943]

[CRLMB-6307/2026]

(2 of 3)

dated 28.07.2025. The case of the petitioner is akin to them. Therefore, on the ground of parity with the co-accused, the present petitioner is also entitled to the grant of bail. Petitioner is behind the bars since 05.02.2025 though 15 cases have been reported against the petitioner but in all the cases he is already on bail. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently the bail application deserves to be allowed.

¶20

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application of the petitioner.

¶21

On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.

¶22

Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Sikandar S/o Shri Shokeen , be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:-

¶23

(i) that the petitioner shall mark his presence before the SHO, Police Station Ramganj (Ajmer), District Ajmer in every 15 days of each month till conclusion of trial.

[2026:RJ-JP:18943]

[CRLMB-6307/2026]

(3 of 3)

(ii) The concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case, the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard.

¶28

(iii) The petitioner shall not repeat any offence in future.

¶29

(iii) If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the trial court the same shall alone be a reason for learned Public Prosecutor to apply for cancellation of bail and trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶30

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶31

Chandan/62

Sikandar S/O Shri Shokeen v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sikandar S/O Shri Shokeen v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rihan S/O Sarpu Vs State of Rajasthan

Abrar S/O Shaukat Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramraj S/O Mannulal Vs the State of Rajasthan

Pawan S/O Shri Bachhu Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Surendra Singh @ Dhanraj S/O Shri Lakha Singh Vs the State of Rajasthan

Rameshwar S/O Late Shri Devalal Vs State of Rajasthan