Dinesh Nagar S/O Birdhi Nagar Vs State of Rajasthan

The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.110/2025 registered at Police Station Deikhera, District Bundi for offences under Sections 305(a) and 331(4) of BNS, 2023.

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation against the present petitioner is that he committed theft at the house of complainant-Ghanshyam. Petitioner is behind the bars since 29.12.2025 though 14 cases have been reported against him, however, in all the cases he is already bailed out. The matter is exclusively triable by the Magistrate. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be

(2 of 3)

[2026:RJ-JP:24147]

[CRLMB-4826/2026]

served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed.

¶19

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶20

On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.

¶21

Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Dinesh Nagar S/o Birdhi Nagar, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:-

¶22

(i) that the petitioner shall mark his presence before the SHO, Police Station Deikhera, District Bundi in every 15 days of each month till conclusion of trial.

¶23

(ii) The concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case, the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard.

¶24

(iii) The petitioner shall not repeat any offence in future.

¶25