Ramkesh S/O Naresh Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

Ramkesh S/O Naresh Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Bail granted: petitioner Ramkesh S/o Naresh to be released on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court, appearing before that Court on all subsequent hearing dates till conclusion of the trial; complainant may seek cancellation of bail if petitioner is found involved in such cases.

Issue for consideration

Whether bail under Section 483 of BNSS should be granted to the petitioner Ramkesh in FIR No.262/2025 registered at Police Station Balghat, District Karauli for offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 329(3), 352 and 3(5) of BNS, 2023.

Court's answer

On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of the petitioner's counsel's submissions, and without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, the Court was inclined to grant the benefit of bail to the petitioner.

Ratio / Principle

The bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed; the petitioner Ramkesh S/o Naresh is to be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial; if he is found involved in such type of cases, the complainant has the right to move an application for cancellation of this bail.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench (single Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pramil Kumar Mathur), by order dated 06/04/2026 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1637/2026, allowed the bail application under Section 483 of BNSS of Ramkesh S/o Naresh, aged about 37 years, resident of Bhopur, P.S. Balghat, District Karauli, presently confined in District Jail Karauli, sought in FIR No.262/2025 registered at Police Station Balghat, District Karauli for offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 329(3), 352 and 3(5) of BNS, 2023. Petitioner in custody since 26.12.2025; chargesheet filed; five criminal antecedents reported but bailed out in all (counsel's submission); counsel argued the injury report of the injured Shree Ram describes all injuries as simple, not supporting the alleged dangerous-to-life character (submission recorded, no opinion expressed on merits). Bail granted on personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court, with appearance on all subsequent hearing dates till trial conclusion; stipulation that if the petitioner is found involved in such type of cases, the complainant may move for cancellation of bail.

[2026:RJ-JP:13997]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1637/2026

Ramkesh S/o Naresh, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Bhopur Police Station Balghat, District Karauli (Raj.) ( Presently Confined In Distt. Jail Karauli)

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. TanmayDhand
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP
For Complainant	: Mr. Umesh Kumar Sharma

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR

Order

06/04/2026

The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.262/2025 registered at Police Station Balghat, District Karauli for offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 329(3), 352 and 3(5) of BNS, 2023.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that according to the medical opinion, alleged injury could be dangerous but the injury report of the injured Shree Ram, does not support the claim that the injuries are dangerous to life as the report itself states that all the injuries are simple in nature. The medical officer's report is not based on the factual assessment of

[2026:RJ-JP:13997]

[CRLMB-1637/2026]

(2 of 2)

the injuries. The petitioner has been in custody since 26.12.2025. Though five criminal antecedents have been reported against the present petitioner but in all cases he has been bailed out. Chargesheet has been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed.

Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application.

On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.

Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Ramkesh S/o Naresh , be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial and if he found involved in such type of cases then complainant has the right to move the application for cancellation of this bail.

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J

Arun/8