Dharmendra S/O Shri Kishan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

[2026:RJ-JP:14102]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1748/2026

Dharmendra S/o Shri Kishan Singh, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Vilanchatpura, Police Station Uchchain, Presently Resident Of O 210, J.j. Colony Soda, North West Delhi.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order

¶11

06/04/2026

¶12

Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.278/2025 registered at Police Station-Uchhain, District-Bharatpur for the offences under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of BNS, 2023, the petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 482 BNSS.

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that the issue pertains to a specific-performance of agreement, which was executed solely by the brother of the petitioner as seller. The petitioner had no role whatsoever in the execution of the said agreement and was neither a signatory nor a witness to it. It is submitted that merely on the ground that the petitioner is

[2026:RJ-JP:14102]

[CRLMB-1748/2026]

(2 of 3)

the brother of the seller, he has been wrongly implicated in the present matter. There is no material to show any active role, whether direct or indirect, of the petitioner in connection with the allegations made in the FIR. The allegations against the petitioner are vague and general in nature, without any specific attribution. The petitioner has neither participated in the transaction nor signed any document. Thus, allegations against the petitioner are baseless and no custodial interrogation is required. He has always been willing to cooperate and undertakes to join and assist in the investigation as and when required. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.

¶19

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the nature of allegations and no specific role was attributed to petitioner but without commenting on the merits/demerits thereof, this Court deems it just and proper to allow the bail application of the petitioner.

¶20

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 482 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioner- Dharmendra S/o Shri Kishan Singh , he shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the

[CRLMB-1748/2026]

[2026:RJ-JP:14102]

(3 of 3)

facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶25

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without prior permission of the court.

¶26

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J