Ansar S/O Gafur Vs State of Rajasthan

[2026:RJ-JP:25236]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3632/2026 URN: CRLMB / 6483U / 2026

Ansar S/o Gafur, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Dondari, Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

¶5

----Accused-Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order

¶11

07/07/2026

¶12

The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 13.02.2026 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge Kaman, District-Deeg in Criminal Misc. Case (CIS) No.246/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.18/2026, Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg for the offences under Sections 111(2)(b), 303(2), 317(2), 318(4), 319(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2) & 61(2)(a) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 66D of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 29.01.2026. He further submits that only one criminal case is reported to be pending against the petitioner, in which he has already been granted bail.

[2026:RJ-JP:25236]

[CRLMB-3632/2026]

(2 of 3)

Learned counsel further submits that the charge-sheet has already been filed in the present case for the offences triable by Magistrate. He contends that the conclusion of the trial is likely to take considerable time. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court, and accordingly prays that the petitioner be enlarged on bail.

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the present bail application.

¶19

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

¶20

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon consideration of the submissions advanced, and particularly the fact that challan has been filed for the offences triable by Magistrate; the conclusion of trial is likely to take a considerable time; petitioner is in custody since 29.01.2026 which is almost more than 5 months, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted subject to imposition of stringent conditions.

¶21

Consequently, the bail application is allowed . It is ordered that the accused-petitioner namely- Ansar S/o Gafur arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.18/2026, Police Station-Kaithwara, District-Deeg, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as

(3 of 3)

[2026:RJ-JP:25236]

[CRLMB-3632/2026]

and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions:

¶26

(i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court;

¶27

(ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected;

¶28

(iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; and

¶29

(iv) In the event the petitioner is found involved in any other case of similar nature in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein.

¶30

(v) The accused-petitioner shall mark his presence before the concerned police station once in a month as fixed by the Investigating Officer and a register shall be maintained for the same by Investigating Officer.

¶31

(vi) In case of any change of residential address, the accused-petitioner shall immediately inform the Investigating Officer as well as the trial Court.

¶32

(BIPIN GUPTA),J

¶33

2/MAHIMA

Ansar S/O Gafur v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ansar S/O Gafur v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ankit S/O Shri Ramkesh Vs State of Rajasthan

Nadeem S/O Akhtar Vs State of Rajasthan

Mustaq S/O Ali Mohommad Vs State of Rajasthan

Shankar S/O Bhagchand Vs State of Rajasthan

Aasif S/O Sarfu Vs State of Rajasthan

Dilshad S/O Jamil Vs State of Rajasthan