Musaid S/O Mubeen, Vs State of Rajasthan

[2026:RJ-JP:11555]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3449/2026

Musaid S/o Mubeen, aged about 25 years, R/o Kheda, Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg. (At present accused-petitioiners confined in Sub Jail Deeg)

¶5

----petitioiners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State of Rajasthan, through P.P.

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4111/2026 Pervez S/o Arshad, aged about 20 years, Resident Of Kheda, Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg, (Currently In District - Jail, Deeg).

¶11

----petitioiners

¶12

Versus
State of Rajasthan, through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent
For petitioiners(s) : Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar Mr. Harendra Singh
For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave,P.P.

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA

¶14

Order

¶15

18/03/2026

¶16

These instant misc. bail applications have been filed by the petitioiners Musaid S/o Mubeen and Pervez S/o Arshad, aged about 25 years and 20 years respectively in connection with the impugned FIR bearing No. 131/2024 dated 25.07.2024 registered at Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg for the offences punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2),

[CRLMB-3449/2026]

[2026:RJ-JP:11555]

(2 of 4)

61(2)(a) of B.N.S. and Section 66-D of the Information Technology Act.

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case and no serious allegations have been levelled against the petitioner. There are no complaint on 1930 against him. In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioners prayed that the petitioiner be enlarged on bail.

¶22

Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposed the bail application.

¶23

Be that as it may.

¶24

Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accusedpetitioiners - Musaid S/o Mubeen and Pervez S/o Arshad on bail.

¶25

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners - Musaid S/o Mubeen and Pervez S/o Arshad shall be released on bail on the following conditions:-

¶26

Accused-petitioners shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs 50,000 each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.

¶27

Within 15 days from the date of this order, the accusedpetitioners shall file an affidavit before the trial Court/ I.O. disclosing the following details: -

¶28

(i) Movable and immovable assets which includes land, buildings, vehicles, deposits, investments all bank accounts and

[2026:RJ-JP:11555]

[CRLMB-3449/2026]

(3 of 4)

digital wallets, UPI IDs cryptocurrency holdings etc. allegedly used in commission of the offence or which the accused-petitioners have in their name.

¶33

(ii) The accused-petitioners shall submit complete transaction statements of all his active bank accounts, UPI IDs and digital payment instruments etc. after every 30 days till completion of the trial to the IO.

¶34

The accused petitioners shall not obtain/use any new SIM card, mobile phone or open new bank account etc. without the prior intimation to the Investigating Officer. 4. The accused-petitioners shall surrender his passport, if they have, before the trial Court immediately after being released on bail. The accused-petitioners shall not leave India without the prior permission of the trial Court.

¶35

The accused-petitioners shall not use any Virtual Private Network (VPN), TOR Browser, Proxy Server or any other form of anonymous network or identity masking technology without permission of IO.

¶36

The accused-petitioners shall submit to the Investigation Officer a comprehensive list of all electronic devices in his possession, including mobile phones, laptops, tablets, external hard disks and pen drive along with their IMEI numbers and serial numbers within 15 days of release under this bail order.

¶37

The accused-petitioners shall provide to the Investigating Officer details of all social media accounts, e-mail accounts, domain registration, websites and online platforms operated or used by the accused-petitioners.

[2026:RJ-JP:11555]

[CRLMB-3449/2026]

(4 of 4)

The accused-petitioners shall not create any social media account in the name of any person, domain name or website without the prior intimation to the Investigation Officer.

¶42

The accused-petitioners shall mark their presence before the concerned police station once in 15 days as fixed by the Investigating Officer and a register shall be maintained for the same by Investigating Officer.

¶43

In case of any change of residential address, the accusedpetitioners shall immediately inform the Investigating Officer as well as the trial Court.

¶44

The accused-petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer whenever called upon and shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

¶45

The accused-petitioners shall not tamper with evidence, influence witnesses or attempt to obstruct the investigation in any manner whatsoever.

¶46

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, failure to provide above information or such other information as desired by IO, shall be treated as a violation of the bail conditions, & further if the accused-petitioners are found to be involved in similar such cases within three years from the date of passing of this order, the public prosecutor shall move an application for cancellation of bail.

¶47

(RAVI CHIRANIA),J

¶48

50-51 - RAVI KHANDELWAL

Musaid S/O Mubeen, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Musaid S/O Mubeen, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Alam S/O Ratti Vs the State of Rajasthan

Vasudev S/O Suresh Vs the State of Rajasthan

Satyaveer @ Dhamas S/O Padam Vs State of Rajasthan

Netrapal Singh S/O Lakhan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Manoj Mehra S/O Prahlad Mehra Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohin S/O Rajamohammad Vs State of Rajasthan