Allowed

Mohin S/O Rajamohammad v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC18 Mar 2026CRLMB/3232/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a bail application filed by two accused persons arrested in connection with offences under B.N.S.S. and the Information Technology (Amendment) Act. The Court imposed comprehensive conditions regarding asset disclosure, electronic monitoring, and submission of bank statements.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners to be released on bail subject to furnishing bond, disclosure of assets and devices, and strict monitoring conditions.

Mohin S/O Rajamohammad Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:11470]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3232/2026

¶4

Mohin S/o Rajamohammad, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Jhantali, Police Station Sikri, District Deeg (Rajasthan).

¶5

Sirajuddin S/o Asruddin, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Akaata, Police Station Kama, District Deeg (Rajasthan). (At Present Accused are Confined in District Jail Deeg).

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arafat Hussain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, P.P.

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA

¶12

Order

¶13

18/03/2026

¶14

1. This bail application has been filed by the petitioners Mohin S/o Rajamohammad & Sirajuddin S/o Asruddin, aged about 19 years and 35 years respectively, who were arrested by the police in connection with the FIR bearing No.19/2026 dated 28.01.2026 registered at Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2) 317(2), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2)(a) of B.N.S. and 66-D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.

¶15

2. Learned counsel submitted that the Police after completing the investigation has filed the charge-sheet and no recovery is required to be made from them. Learned counsel further submitted that the allegations levelled against the accused-

[2026:RJ-JP:11470]

[CRLMB-3232/2026]

(2 of 4)

petitioners are petty in nature. In view thereof, learned counsel prayed that the accused-petitioners be enlarged on bail.

¶20

3. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposed the bail application and informed this Court about the conduct of the accused-petitioners, which reflects that no complaints were registered against them on ‘1930’, also, no serious offences were involved.

¶21

4. This Court after considering the charge-sheet, nature of allegations as reported in the FIR, petitioners are behind the bar since 28.01.2026, overall facts and circumstances and without commenting upon merits of the matter, is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners Mohin S/o Rajamohammad & Sirajuddin S/o Asruddin, on bail.

¶22

5. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners - Mohin S/o Rajamohammad & Sirajuddin S/o Asruddin, shall be released on bail on the following conditions:-

¶23

Each of the accused-petitioners shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. 2. Within 15 days from the date of this order, the accusedpetitioners shall file an affidavit before the trial Court/ I.O. disclosing the following details: -

¶24

(i) Movable and immovable assets which includes land, buildings, vehicles, deposits, investments all bank accounts and digital wallets, UPI IDs cryptocurrency holdings etc. allegedly used

[2026:RJ-JP:11470]

[CRLMB-3232/2026]

(3 of 4)

in commission of the offence or which the accused-petitioners have in their name.

¶29

(ii) The accused-petitioners shall submit complete transaction statements of all of their active bank accounts, UPI IDs and digital payment instruments etc. after every 30 days till completion of the trial to the IO.

¶30

The accused-petitioners shall not obtain/use any new SIM card, mobile phone or open new bank account etc. without the prior intimation to the Investigating Officer.

¶31

The accused-petitioners shall surrender his passport, if they have, before the trial Court immediately after being released on bail. The accused-petitioners shall not leave India without the prior permission of the trial Court.

¶32

The accused-petitioners shall not use any Virtual Private Network (VPN), TOR Browser, Proxy Server or any other form of anonymous network or identity masking technology without permission of IO.

¶33

The accused-petitioners shall submit to the Investigation Officer a comprehensive list of all electronic devices in their possession, including mobile phones, laptops, tablets, external hard disks and pen drive along with their IMEI numbers and serial numbers within 15 days of release under this bail order.

¶34

The accused-petitioners shall provide to the Investigating Officer details of all social media accounts, e-mail accounts, domain registration, websites and online platforms operated or used by the accused-petitioners.

(4 of 4)

[2026:RJ-JP:11470]

[CRLMB-3232/2026]

The accused-petitioners shall not create any social media account in the name of any person, domain name or website without the prior intimation to the Investigation Officer.

¶39

The accused-petitioners shall mark their presence before the concerned police station once in 15 days as fixed by the Investigating Officer and a register shall be maintained for the same by Investigating Officer.

¶40

In case of any change of residential address, the accusedpetitioners shall immediately inform the Investigating Officer as well as the trial Court.

¶41

The accused-petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer whenever called upon and shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

¶42

The accused-petitioners shall not tamper with evidence, influence witnesses or attempt to obstruct the investigation in any manner whatsoever.

¶43

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, failure to provide above information or such other information as desired by IO, shall be treated as a violation of the bail conditions, & further if the accused-petitioners are found to be involved in similar such cases within three years from the date of passing of this order, the public prosecutor shall move an application for cancellation of bail.

¶44

(RAVI CHIRANIA),J

¶45

Dushyant Singh/40

Mohin S/O Rajamohammad v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohin S/O Rajamohammad v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Alam S/O Ratti Vs the State of Rajasthan

Vasudev S/O Suresh Vs the State of Rajasthan

Satyaveer @ Dhamas S/O Padam Vs State of Rajasthan

Musaid S/O Mubeen, Vs State of Rajasthan

Netrapal Singh S/O Lakhan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Manoj Mehra S/O Prahlad Mehra Vs State of Rajasthan