Chhotu Singh S/O Late Shri Suva Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

[2026:RJ-JP:12026]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2376/2026

Chhotu Singh S/o Late Shri Suva Singh, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Bardiya Ki Dhani, Kotra, P.s. Haribhau Upadhayay Nagar, Ajmer. (At Present Accused Is Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3019/2026 Karan Singh S/o Nand Kishor, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Bairwa Basti, Kotda, Pushkar Road, Ajmer (Raj.) (At Present In Central Jail, Ajmer).

¶11

----Petitioner

¶12

Versus

¶13

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶14

----Respondent

¶15

For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. Swadeep Singh Hora with Mr. Sahajveer Baweja Mr. Himanshu Agarwal Mr. Shyam Bihari Gautam
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, AGA Mr. Avi Airun
		Mr. Deepak Parashar

¶16

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR

¶17

Order

¶18

23/03/2026

¶19

The petitioners have filed these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.97/2025 registered at Police Station Haribhau Upadhayay Nagar, District Ajmer for offence under Sec-

[2026:RJ-JP:12026]

[CRLMB-2376/2026]

(2 of 3)

tions 115(2), 109(1), 303(2), 324(4), 324(5) and 189(2) of BNS, 2023.

¶24

Since both these bail applications arise out of common FIR, hence, they are being decided by this common order.

¶25

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned counsel for the complainant and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

¶26

Learned counsel for the petitioner Chhotu Singh submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He argued that in the present matter, none of the injuries are on vital part of the body of the injured and as per the medical report, there is amputation of left leg and as per medical opinion above injury could be dangerous to life in absence of treatment, while there is ample material on record which shows that proper treatment was given to injured. He again submits that there is no recovery from the petitioner and the petitioner is behind the bars since 02.10.2025 without any criminal past, the trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody.

¶27

With respect to petitioner Karan Singh, it has been contended that name of the petitioner has not been mentioned in the FIR and he has been in custody since 02.10.2025 without any criminal antecedents. Hence, the bail applications of both the petitioners are prayed to be allowed.

¶28

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications.

¶29

On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned

(3 of 3)

[2026:RJ-JP:12026]

[CRLMB-2376/2026]

counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.

¶34

Consequently, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Chhotu Singh S/o Late Shri Suva Singh and Karan Singh S/o Nand Kishor, be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that each of them shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.

¶35

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶36

bmg /53-54

Chhotu Singh S/O Late Shri Suva Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chhotu Singh S/O Late Shri Suva Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay S/O Sunil Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Pushpendra @ Pussu S/O Late Sh. Ghanshaym Vs the State of Rajasthan

Asfak @ Aspak S/O Aabid Vs State of Rajasthan

Vishal S/O Vijay Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Rampratap Bairwa S/O Kishan Lal Alias Kashan Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Karan Singh S/O Nand Kishor Vs the State of Rajasthan