Allowed

Mantu Thakur @ Ramu @ Manoj S/O Shri Rajendra Thakur v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 Mar 2026CRLMB/2107/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed the bail application of the accused-petitioner facing charges under Section 305(a) BNS. Considering the petitioner's lack of criminal antecedents, prolonged custody, and the anticipated long duration of the trial, the court granted bail on the furnishing of a personal bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted subject to furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each.

Mantu Thakur @ Ramu @ Manoj S/O Shri Rajendra Thakur Vs… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:9697]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2107/2026

¶4

Mantu Thakur @ Ramu @ Manoj S/o Shri Rajendra Thakur, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Gram Devandih, Belhar, Sotadih, Banka, Bihar. (At Present Lodge At Central Jail Jaipur).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishal Gaur for Mr. Avinash Dhanju For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP Mr. Gaurav Gupta, PP Mr. Ram Sharan Singh

¶10

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA

¶11

Order

¶12

06/03/2026

¶13

This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accusedpetitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 07/2026 registered at Police Station Bajaj Nagar, District Jaipur City (East) for the offence(s) under Section 305(a) of BNS, 2023.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and recovery has already been effected. Learned counsel also contends that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent; he is in custody since 14.01.2026. He further submits that conclusion of trial may take long time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in custody and therefore, prays that the petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.

[2026:RJ-JP:9697]

[CRLMB-2107/2026]

(2 of 2)

Per contra , learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner hereinabove.

¶19

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner that there is no criminal antecedent registered against the petitioner and petitioner is inu custody since 14.01.2026 and trial will take considerably long time in its conclusion. Without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶20

Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Mantu Thakur @ Ramu @ Manoj S/o Shri Rajendra Thakur is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.

¶22

(SANGEETA SHARMA),J

¶23

HEENA/100

Mantu Thakur @ Ramu @ Manoj S/O Shri Rajendra Thakur v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mantu Thakur @ Ramu @ Manoj S/O Shri Rajendra Thakur v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Faimuddeen S/O Shri Naimuddeen Vs State of Rajasthan

Noratan S/O Shri Bhajan Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhanwar Lal Nagar S/O Shri Ghanshyam Nagar Vs State of Rajasthan

Pintu Bairwa S/O Bhagwan Sahay Bairwa Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajuram S/O Gopiram Vs the State of Rajasthan

Chhotilal S/O Late Sh. Bhagwan Sahai Vs the State of Rajasthan