Munsad S/O Bhuttu Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

Munsad S/O Bhuttu Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Both bail applications allowed; petitioners Munsad S/o Bhuttu and Mafar S/o Islam released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- each with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, with the stipulation that each shall appear before the trial court on all subsequent hearing dates till conclusion of the trial; no opinion expressed on merits.

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioners, accused in FIR No.2/2026 of Police Station Pahari, District Deeg, are entitled to be released on bail under Section 483 of BNSS.

Court's answer

On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record, and in the light of counsel's submissions (parity with co-accused Nisar, Gambhir and Mujahidin enlarged on bail on 17.03.2026, custody since 01.01.2026, charge-sheet filed), the court granted the benefit of bail to both petitioners without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case.

Ratio / Principle

Each petitioner (Munsad S/o Bhuttu and Mafar S/o Islam) is to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of the learned trial court.

Key takeaways

As a stipulation of bail, each petitioner shall appear before the trial court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.ratio¶¶31

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bail granted — S.483 BNSS — FIR No.2/2026, P.S. Pahari, District Deeg — offences under Ss.319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) & 61(2)(a) BNS 2023 and S.66-D IT Act 2008 — accused-petitioners Munsad S/o Bhuttu and Mafar S/o Islam in custody since 01.01.2026, charge-sheet filed — parity invoked with co-accused Nisar, Gambhir and Mujahidin enlarged on bail by Coordinate Bench on 17.03.2026 — bail allowed without expressing opinion on merits — conditions: personal bond Rs.50,000/- each with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each; appearance before trial court on all hearing dates till conclusion of trial. (High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench; Pramil Kumar Mathur, J.; 24.03.2026; [2026:RJ-JP:12253])

[2026:RJ-JP:12253]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1309/2026

Munsad S/o Bhuttu, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Dantka, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

Connected With

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2589/2026 Mafar S/o Islam, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Mothuka, Police Station Pahari, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Deeg).

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Ankit Khandelwal Mr. Arafat Hussain
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP with
	Mr. Gaurav Gupta,AGA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR

Order

24/03/2026

The petitioners have filed these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.2/2026 registered at Police Station Pahari, District Deeg for offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2)(a) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66-D of IT Act, 2008.

[2026:RJ-JP:12253]

[CRLMB-1309/2026]

(2 of 3)

Since both these bail applications arise out of common FIR, hence, they are being decided by this common order.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. Coaccused-Nisar, Gambhir and Mujahidin have been enlarged on bail by Coordinate Bench of this Court on 17.03.2026. The case of the present petitioners are akin to them. Petitioners are behind the bars since 01.01.2026 without any criminal past. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, accordingly, the bail applications deserves to be allowed.

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications.

On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.

Consequently, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Munsad S/o Bhuttu and Mafar S/o Islam, be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that

(3 of 3) [CRLMB-1309/2026]

[2026:RJ-JP:12253]

each of them shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J

Arun/28-29