Allowed

Suraj S/O Brajmohan v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC17 Mar 2026CRLMB/1081/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the State's opposition and allowed bail for accused petitioners under Section 483 BNSS, releasing them on personal bond and two sureties without expressing an opinion on case merits.

What did the court decide?

Accused-petitioners released on personal bond of Rs. 100,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/each to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

Suraj S/O Brajmohan Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:11282]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1081/2026

¶4

Suraj S/o Brajmohan, R/o House No. F-37 Bombey Yojna Subhash Nagar Thana Anantpura Kota City. (At Present Confined At Central Jail Kota).

¶5

Pradeep S/o Kunjbihari, R/o Karbala Road Infrontof New Police Chowki Ladpura Thana Rampura Kotwali Kota. (At Present Confined At Central Jail Kota).

¶6

----Accused-Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Abdul Kalam Khan
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Tapesh Agarwal,PP

¶11

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA

¶12

Order

¶13

17/03/2026

¶14

This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accusedpetitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 333/2025 registered at Police Station Anantpura, District Kota for the offence(s) under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 117(2), 118(1), 109(1), 3(5) BNS.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case; charge-sheet has already been filed; He further submits that petitioners are behind the bars since long; there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners; The injuries sustained by the injured neither fatal nor dangerous to life; trial will take its own time; so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners

[2026:RJ-JP:11282]

[CRLMB-1081/2026]

(2 of 2)

behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.

¶20

Per contra , learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that charge sheet has already been filed; there are no criminal antecedents against the accusedpetitioners; petitioners are behind the bars since long; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail.

¶21

Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners 1. Suraj S/o Brajmohan 2. Pradeep S/o Kunjbihari are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶22

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.

¶23

(SANGEETA SHARMA),J

¶24

SHIVANI/65

Suraj S/O Brajmohan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suraj S/O Brajmohan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bobby Singh S/O Shri Munna Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Shobhag Urf Palit S/O Ramswaroop S/O Kailash Vs State of Rajasthan

Kulveer Mor S/O Baljeet Mor Vs State of Rajasthan

Vishal Mishra S/O Shri Uday Narayan Mishra Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramkishan @ Prakash S/O Baluram @ Bodu Vs the State of Rajasthan

Shailendra Singh @ Shailu S/O Suresh Singh Vs State of Rajasthan