Allowed

Anand Son of Shri Ramavtar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC7 Jul 2026CRLMB/10264/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application allowed. The court considered submissions that no injury was caused, the petitioner was already on bail in other cases, and the trial would take considerable time. The petitioner was granted bail on executing a personal bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each.

Anand Son of Shri Ramavtar Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:25344]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10264/2026 URN: CRLMB / 19014U / 2026

¶4

Anand Son Of Shri Ramavtar, Reside Of Singnor, Police Station Gudha Gorji, District Jhunjhunu Now Reside At Purohit Ki Dhani, Police Station Udhyog Nagar Sikar, District Sikar Rajasthan ( At Present Confined At District Jail Sikar)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepak Soni For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order

¶11

07/07/2026

¶12

The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.114/2026 registered at Police Station Sadar Sikar, District Sikar for offences under Sections 109(1), 111(2)(b), 111(4), 132 and 3(5) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation against the present petitioner is that he attempted to commit murder by intentionally driving the vehicle towards the complainant party. However, no injury was inflicted upon any person. It is further submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 07.04.2026. Though five criminal cases have been

[2026:RJ-JP:25344]

[CRLMB-10264/2026]

(2 of 2)

reported against the petitioner, he has already been enlarged on bail in all those cases. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶19

On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submissions made on behalf of petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Anand Son Of Shri Ramavtar , be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.

¶20

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶21

51/Arun

Anand Son of Shri Ramavtar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anand Son of Shri Ramavtar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aashif Ali S/O Mohammad Salim Vs State of Rajasthan

Pappu Meghwal S/O Gopal Vs the State of Rajasthan

Bhanwar Singh S/O Jodhraj Vs State of Rajasthan

Amit Rathor S/O Bablu Rathor Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhanwar Singh Son of Shri Jodhraj Singh, Vs State of Rajasthan

Devraj S/O Mangilal Vs State of Rajasthan