Allowed

Aashif Ali S/O Mohammad Salim v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 Jul 2026CRLMB/5557/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur, granted bail to four petitioners (Aashif Ali, Mohammed Arbaz, Shahid Husain, and Rijwan) in criminal bail applications filed under Section 483 of BNSS arising from a common FIR involving alleged life-threatening injuries.

What did the court decide?

Release of petitioners on bail with personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, appearing for further hearings.

Aashif Ali S/O Mohammad Salim Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:24990]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5557/2026 URN: CRLMB / 9899U / 2026

¶4

Aashif Ali S/o Mohammad Salim, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Mahaveer Colony, Behind New Nehru School Nainwa Road, Bundi Police Station Kotwali District Bundi (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Bundi).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10103/2026 URN: CRLMB / 18765U / 2026

¶11

Mohammed Arbaz S/o Mohammed Vajib @ Laddu, R/o Behind Nayakon Ka Mandir Kagji Devra Bundi Police Thana Kotwali Bundi District Bundi Rajasthan. (At Present Confined At District Jail Bundi).

¶12

----Petitioner

¶13

Versus

¶14

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶15

----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10104/2026 URN: CRLMB / 18767U / 2026

¶16

Shahid Husain @ Bachcha S/o Nisar Ahmed, R/o Sattar Paan Wale Ki Gali Mahaveer Colony Bundi At Present Brahmpuri Bundi Police Thana Kotwali District Bundi Rajasthan. (At Present Confined At District Jail Bundi).

¶17

Rijwan S/o Jafar Mohammed, R/o Mahaveer Colony Bundi Police Thana Kotwali District Bundi Rajasthan. (At Present Confined At District Jail Bundi).

¶18

----Petitioners

¶19

Versus

¶20

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶21

----Respondent

¶22

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Abdul Rahim Khan
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP
For Complainant	: Mr. Gourav Sharma for Mr. Nitin Kumar Sharma

¶23

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order

06/07/2026

[2026:RJ-JP:24990]

[CRLMB-5557/2026]

(2 of 3)

The petitioners have filed these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.102/2026 registered at Police Station Kotwali Bundi, District Bundi for offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1) and 189(2) of BNS, 2023.

¶29

Since all these bail applications arise out of common FIR, hence, they are being decided by this common order.

¶30

Heard learned counsels for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record.

¶31

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. He further submits that though the allegations against the petitioners are that they caused life-threatening injuries to the injured, Saddam Khan, there is no medical opinion on record to establish that any of the injuries sustained by the injured were dangerous to life. The injury report, read along with the X-ray report, indicates that the injuries were simple in nature. The petitioners have been in judicial custody since 24.03.2026. It is further submitted that two criminal cases have been reported against petitioner Aashif Ali, six criminal cases against petitioner Mohammed Arbaz, two criminal cases against petitioner Rijwan, and four criminal cases against petitioner Shahid Husain @ Bachcha in which they are on bail. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, consequently, the bail applications deserves to be allowed.

¶32

Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail applications of the petitioners.

[2026:RJ-JP:24990]

[CRLMB-5557/2026]

(3 of 3)

On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.

¶37

Consequently, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Aashif Ali S/o Mohammad Salim, Mohammed Arbaz S/o Mohammed Vajib @ Laddu, Shahid Husain @ Bachcha S/o Nisar Ahmed and Rijwan S/o Jafar Mohammed , be released on bail provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that each of them shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.

¶38

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶39

14-16/Arun

Aashif Ali S/O Mohammad Salim v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aashif Ali S/O Mohammad Salim v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ghanshyam @ Bhalu S/O Shrawan Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Ankit S/O Bhuralal Vs the State of Rajasthan

Shimbhudayal Bhama S/O Lichman Ram Vs the State of Rajasthan

Pappu Meghwal S/O Gopal Vs the State of Rajasthan

Bhanwar Singh S/O Jodhraj Vs State of Rajasthan

Sunil S/O Bhojraj Vs State of Rajasthan