Disposed

Anand Prakash Sharma, S/O Shri Omprakash Sharma, v. Niranjan Kumar Arya

Rajasthan HC6 Jan 2026CRES/486/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought restoration of a miscellaneous application dismissed for want of prosecution, with an application to condone a 173-day delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court condoned the delay, allowed the restoration application, and restored the miscellaneous application to its original number.

What did the court decide?

Delay condoned; restoration application allowed; Miscellaneous Application No.16/2022 restored to its original number.

Anand Prakash Sharma, S/O Shri Omprakash Sharma, Vs… — Contempt of Court | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:55-DB]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

D.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 486/2025

¶4

¶5

D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Application No.16/2022

¶6

¶7

D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.711/2020

¶8

¶9

D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9845/2016

¶10

Anand Prakash Sharma, S/o Shri Omprakash Sharma, R/o House No. 1043, Bagru Walo Ka Rasta, Chandpole Bazar, Jaipur.

¶11

Subhash Chandra Sharma, S/o Shri Ram Kumar Sharma, R/o 91-A, Prabhat Colony, Vijay Bari, Path No. 7, Murlipura, Jaipur.

¶12

Ramsharan Sharma S/o Shri Raghuver Sharan, R/o Plot No. 59-60, Radha Vihar Colony, Shyopur Mod, Tonk Road, Jaipur.

¶13

Sanjay Panchal S/o Shri Chotmal Panchal, R/o Plot No. 1940, Dhabhai Ji Khurra, Badi Chopar, Jaipur.

¶14

----Non-applicants/Petitioners

¶15

Versus

¶16

Niranjan Kumar Arya, Principal Secretary Cum Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Finance, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶17

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Cum Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Finance, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶18

----Applicants/Respondents

¶19

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Sankalp Vijay
	Ms. Ritika Naruka
	Mr. Deepak Mittal
For Respondent(s)	:

¶20

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA

¶21

Order

¶22

06/01/2026

¶23

Instant Restoration Application has been filed by the Non-

¶24

applicant-petitioners, seeking to restore the D.B. Civil

[2026:RJ-JP:55-DB]

[CRES-486/2025]

(2 of 2)

Miscellaneous Application No.16/2022, which came to be dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 15.01.2025. 2. The instant application is delayed by 173 days for which application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act has been filed, seeking to condone the delay in filing Restoration Application.

¶29

For the reasons mentioned in the application, same is allowed and delay in filing Restoration Application is condoned. 4. Considering the reasons assigned in the Restoration Application, same is allowed. D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Application No.16/2022 is permitted to be restored to its original number. 5. Instant Restoration Application stands disposed of accordingly.

¶30

(SANDEEP TANEJA),J

¶31

(SUDESH BANSAL),J

¶32

RONAK JAIMAN/2

Anand Prakash Sharma, S/O Shri Omprakash Sharma, v. Niranjan Kumar Arya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anand Prakash Sharma, S/O Shri Omprakash Sharma, v. Niranjan Kumar Arya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Narayan Meena S/O Shri Bhanwar Lal Meena Vs Shri Niranjan Arya

Raghuram Meena S/O Shri Hari Kishan Meena Vs Dinesh Kumar

Sunil Gurjar S/O Shri Palaram, Vs Union of Inida