Sunil Gurjar S/O Shri Palaram, Vs Union of Inida — Rajasthan HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Sunil Gurjar S/O Shri Palaram, Vs Union of Inida — Rajasthan HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Contempt Petition dismissed as not pressed, with liberty as prayed for to avail appropriate remedy against the order dated 09.12.2025 or any other fresh order; pending applications, if any, disposed of.

Issue for consideration

Whether the respondents were to be further proceeded against in the contempt petition (concerning the petitioner's grievance of non-sanctioning of his leave), in view of the fresh inquiry initiated against the petitioner under the order dated 09.12.2025.

Ratio / Principle

Since the inquiry against the petitioner had been initiated under a fresh order dated 09.12.2025 (Annx.4 with the Contempt Petition), counsel for the petitioner did not press the Contempt Petition.

Key takeaways

The Contempt Petition was dismissed as not pressed.ratio¶24
The petitioner was granted liberty as prayed for, i.e., to avail appropriate remedy against the order dated 09.12.2025 or any other fresh order.ratio¶25
All pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.ratio¶26

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1417/2025 in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 290/2025 (High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur; coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sudesh Bansal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Taneja; order dated 06/01/2026). Petitioner Sunil Gurjar, Sipahi/Mochi, 163 Battalion, CRPF (posted at Anantnag), acting through his wife Nirmala Devi, had sought contempt action in relation to the non-sanctioning of his leave. The Court, having noted that an inquiry against the petitioner had been initiated under a fresh order dated 09.12.2025 (Annx.4 with the Contempt Petition), recorded that counsel for the petitioner did not press the petition. The Contempt Petition was dismissed as not pressed, with liberty as prayed for to avail appropriate remedy against the order dated 09.12.2025 or any other fresh order, and all pending applications, if any, stood disposed of. No statute or precedent was cited in the order.

[2026:RJ-JP:54-DB]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1417/2025

in

D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.290/2025

Sunil Gurjar S/o Shri Palaram, Resident Of Gurjaron Ki Dhani Is Posted As Sipahu/mochi, 163, Battalion Of Central Reserve Police Force, Keripur Kanjikund, Anantnag, Sri Nagar Since Leaves Have Not Been Sanctioned Therefore Through His Wife Nirmala Devi Aged About 30 Years Resident Of Gurjaron Ki Dhani, Jhunjhunu.

----Petitioner

Versus

Union Of Inida, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Secretariat, New Delhi.

Shri Govind Mohan, Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Of India, Government Secretariat, New Delhi (Email-Hm @mha.gov. In).

Shri Gyanender Pratap Singh, Director General Of Central Reserve Police Force, New Delhi.([email protected]).

Shri Dr. Archana Shivhare, Inspector General Of Central Reserve Police Force, Nayla, Rajasthan Sector, District Jaipur (Raj.)([email protected]. In).

Shri Pukhraj Jaipal, Dy. Inspector General Of Police, Central Reserve Police Force, Golf Road, Ajmer Range, Ajmer (Raj.) ([email protected]).

Shri Nripendra Kumar Singh, Commandant, 163, Battalion, Central Reserve Police Force, Kanjikund, Anantnaag, Shri Nagar ([email protected]).

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.	Tanveer Ahamad
For Respondent(s)	: Ms.	Manjeet Kaur
	Ms.	Taruna
	Ms.	Garvita Sharma

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA Order

06/01/2026

Having argued the Contempt Petition on merits and in view of the fact that inquiry against the petitioner has been initiated under a fresh order dated 09.12.2025 (Annx.4 with the Contempt Petition), counsel for petitioner does not press this Contempt

(2 of 2)

[2026:RJ-JP:54-DB]

[CCP-1417/2025]

Petition and seeks liberty to avail appropriate remedy against the order dated 09.12.2025 or any other fresh order.

Accordingly, the Contempt Petition is dismissed as not press

with the liberty as prayed for.

All pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.

(SANDEEP TANEJA),J

(SUDESH BANSAL),J

RONAK JAIMAN/1