Allowed

Himmat Singh S/O Amar Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC3 Feb 2026CRLMB/639/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Second bail application by an accused in a cheating and forgery case involving forged documents prepared for showing premises on rent. Custody since June 2025; chargesheet filed; bail granted on furnishing bond of one lakh rupees and two sureties of twenty-five thousand each.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on furnishing personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each, subject to appearance as directed.

Himmat Singh S/O Amar Singh Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:5062]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 639/2026

¶4

Himmat Singh S/o Amar Singh, R/o Village Khedla Khurd, Tehsil Lalsot, Station Mandawari, District Dausa, Presently Residing At House No. 30, Pooja Vihar, Jobner Road, Station Kalwar, Jaipur. At Present Central Jail, Jaipur

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shivam Kumar Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP Mr. Santosh Singh Shakhawat, Adv. Mr. Subhash Chand, SI P.S. Jhotwara & Mr. Sunil, FC No. 7680 present in person.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶11

Judgment / Order

¶12

03/02/2026

¶13

izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= 483 ch-,u-,l-,l- ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk &>ksVokMk] t;iqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k &521@2024 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 420] 406] 467] 468] 471] 120ch Hkk-na-la- esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA

¶14

fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr us rdZ fn;k fd vfHk;qDr funksZ"k gS] izFke tekur vkosnu okfil fy;s tkus ds vk/kkj ij xq.k&nks"kksa ij tk;s fcuk [kkfjt fd;k x;k Fkk] yEcs le; ls vfHkj{kk eas gS] fopkj.k esa le; yxsxk] blfy, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶15

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd rFkk fo}ku vf/koDrk ifjoknh us vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, ;g tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA

[2026:RJ-JP:5062]

[CRLMB-639/2026]

(2 of 2)

nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶20

orZeku ekeys esa vfHk;qDr ij ;g vkjksi gS fd mlus fdjk;snkjh nf'kZr djus ds fy, dwVjfpr nLrkost rS;kj dj lEifRr ij dCtk djus dk iz;kl fd;kA

¶21

vfHk;qDr fnukad 24-06-2025 ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] izdj.k esa ckn vuqla/kku vkjksi i= is'k gks pqdk gS] fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk gSA vr% izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izLrqr rdksaZ ,oa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vfHkj{kk vof/k dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶22

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr fgEer flag iq= vej flag dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; ;k varfjrh U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk cU/k&i= rFkk ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`< izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr dj izekf.kr djkos rks gLrxr izdj.k esa mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A

¶23

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶24

Mittal /11

Himmat Singh S/O Amar Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Himmat Singh S/O Amar Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sohan Lal Son of Shri Gopiram, Vs State of Rajasthan

Subhash Yadav S/O Shri Rajendra Vs State of Rajasthan

Kunal Gupta S/O Shri Rajesh Gupta Vs Narcotic Control Bureau

Sitaram Yogi S/O Misharya Lal Yogi, Vs Narayan Lal Bairwa S/O Shri Ramkunwar Bairwa

Babulal S/O Bherulal, Vs Phool Chand S/O Bhairulal

I C I C I Lombarad Gen Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Smt Santosh Alias Patasi and Others