Allowed

Balu Singh S/O Parthi Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC3 Feb 2026CRLMB/1154/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Second regular bail application by a 79-year-old petitioner arrested under FIR No. 183/2025 for alleged encroachment on government land and storing large quantities of spirit to make illicit liquor, filed under Sections 16, 54 and 54(a) Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950. Noting advanced age, completed investigation and filed charge-sheet, the court granted bail subject to a bond and two fixed sureties.

What the court decided

AI extract

Balu Singh S/O Parthi Singh Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:4928]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 1154/2026

¶4

Balu Singh S/o Parthi Singh, Aged About 79 Years, R/o Luhariya, Police Station Dug, District Jhalawar (Raj.) (Presently Confined In Sub Jail At Bhawani Mandi).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s)

¶10

: Mr. Rajveer Singh Jhala, Adv. : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶12

Judgment / Order

¶13

03/02/2026

¶14

izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= ch-,u-,l-,l- dh /kkjk 483 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk&Mx] >kykokM+ esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&183@2025 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 16] 54] 54¼A½ jktLFkku vkcdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1950 esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA

¶15

fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr us rdZ fn;k fd vfHk;qDr funksZ"k gS] mls feF;k :i ls vkfyIr fd;k x;k gS] vfHk;qDr 79 o"khZ; o`) gS] vuqla/kku gksdj vkjksi i= is'k gks pqdk gS] fopkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vr% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶16

blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk ;g tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶17

nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;kA

[2026:RJ-JP:4928]

[CRLMB-1154/2026]

(2 of 2)

izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk izFke tekur vkosnu vkjksi i= izLrqfr ds mijkar uohu tekur vkosnu is'k djus dh Lora=rk ds lkFk okfil fy;k x;k FkkA

¶22

orZeku ekeys esa vfHk;qDr ds fo:) ;g vkjksi gS fd mlus ljdkjh Hkwfe ij vfrØe.k dj edku cuk;k rFkk mlesa Hkkjh ek=k esa fLizV o vU; lkexzh j[kdj uktk;t 'kjkc cukus ds d`R; esa fyIr jgk gSA ;|fi vfHk;qDr ds fo:) xaHkhj vijk/k dk vkjksi gS] ysfdu vfHk;qDr dh 79 o"kZ dh vk;q gS] vuqla/kku gksdj vkjksi i= is'k gks pqdk gS] 'ks"k fopkj.k esa le; yxsxkA

¶23

vr% izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izLrqr rdksaZ] vfHk;qDr dh o)koLFkk ,oa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vfHkj{kk vof/k vkfn dks nf"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶24

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ckyw flag iq= ijFkh flag dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; ;k varfjrh U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk cU/k&i= rFkk ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`< izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr dj izekf.kr djkos rks gLrxr izdj.k esa mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A

¶25

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶26

DINESH KUMAWAT /08

Balu Singh S/O Parthi Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Balu Singh S/O Parthi Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sohan Lal Son of Shri Gopiram, Vs State of Rajasthan

Subhash Yadav S/O Shri Rajendra Vs State of Rajasthan

Kunal Gupta S/O Shri Rajesh Gupta Vs Narcotic Control Bureau

Sitaram Yogi S/O Misharya Lal Yogi, Vs Narayan Lal Bairwa S/O Shri Ramkunwar Bairwa

Babulal S/O Bherulal, Vs Phool Chand S/O Bhairulal

I C I C I Lombarad Gen Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Smt Santosh Alias Patasi and Others