Radhey Shyam Dadhich Son of Shri Shivdutt v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC18 Mar 2025WRES/179/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Search terms: writ restoration application; WRES-179/2025; restoration of dismissed writ petition; non-compliance of peremptory order dated 13.01.2025; undertaking to remove defect/s; petition restored to original number; Rajasthan High Court Jaipur; S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18379/2024; Bundi (Collector / Land Acquisition Officer / Ceiling); Justice Sudesh Bansal; Mr. Rajendra Sharma. Relevant for tracking revival of petitions dismissed on procedural/peremptory-order grounds; contains no legal holdings on substantive policy.

What did the court decide?

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18379/2024 restored to its original number. ¶¶24

Radhey Shyam Dadhich Son of Shri Shivdutt Vs State of Rajasthan — Rajasthan HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:12124]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Writ Restoration Application No. 179/2025

¶4

¶5

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18379/2024

¶6

Radhey Shyam Dadhich Son Of Shri Shivdutt, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Purohit Ji Ki Gali, Bundi, Tehsil And District Bundi.

¶7

Chhotu Lal Son Of Shri Shivdutt, R/o Purohit Ji Ki Gali, Bundi, Tehsil And District Bundi.

¶8

----Petitioners

¶9

Versus

¶10

State Of Rajasthan, Through Collector, Bundi.

¶11

State Of Rajasthan, Through Authorized Officer (Land Acquisition Officer) And Addl. District Collector (Ceiling) Bundi Raj,

¶12

Jagdish Son Kishan Lal, R/o Jajjawar, Tehsil Nainwa And District Bundi.

¶13

----Respondents

¶14

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Rajendra Sharma
For Respondent(s)	:

¶15

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL

¶16

Order

¶17

18/03/2025

¶18

Instant restoration application has been filed for restoring S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18379/2024, which came to be dismissed due to non-compliance of peremptory order dated 13.01.2025.

¶19

Counsel for applicant undertakes to remove the defect/s soon after restoration of the writ petition.

¶20

Taking into consideration reasons mentioned in the application and undertaking of counsel for applicant to remove the defect/s, this Court deems it just and proper to allow the instant application.

(2 of 2)

[2025:RJ-JP:12124]

[WRES-179/2025]

Accordingly, the instant restoration application is allowed and S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18379/2024 is allowed to be restored to its original number.

¶25

(SUDESH BANSAL),J

¶26

TN/39

Radhey Shyam Dadhich Son of Shri Shivdutt v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Radhey Shyam Dadhich Son of Shri Shivdutt v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Charan Singh S/O Late Gordhan Singh Vs Kusum Kumari W/O Late Gopal Singh

Prahlad Balai Andors Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Sushma Yadav D/O Shri Sunder Singh, W/O Shri Sandeep Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Dhamu Lal Son of Moti Lal Vs the Chief Managing Director/Chairman

Babu Lal Saini S/O Shri Gyarsi Lal Saini Vs Rajasthan State Co-Operative Tribunal

St. Marys Higher Secondary School Educational Society Vs State of Rajasthan