Allowed

Vishnu S/O Soranlal Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC15 Dec 2025SOSA/2532/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicant convicted by trial court sought suspension of sentence pending appeal. Court, without commenting on merits, suspended the sentence and released the applicant on bail on a personal bond with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Sentence suspended during pendency of appeal; applicant released on bail on personal bond Rs.1,00,000 and two sureties of Rs.50,000 each, to appear before the Court on 15.01.2026.

Vishnu S/O Soranlal Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application No.2532/2025

¶3

¶4

S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 3238/2025

¶5

Vishnu S/o Soranlal Sharma, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Khamni, Police Station Highway Mathura, U.P.

¶6

----Appellant

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Yogesh Singhal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, P.P.

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order

¶12

15/12/2025

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the parties on the application filed for suspension of sentence and perused the entire material available on record.

¶14

Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that there is no reliable and legally acceptable evidence to hold the accusedapplicant guilty for the alleged offence(s) and there is every likelihood of succeeding in the criminal appeal. Learned counsel further submits that accused-applicant was on bail during trial and his sentence has already been suspended by the learned trial Court for a period of one month. Learned counsel further submits that final hearing of the appeal is likely to take time thus sentence of the accused-applicant may be suspended.

¶15

[SOSA-2532/2025 in CRLAS3238/2025]

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer regarding suspension of sentence.

¶18

I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties.

¶19

Without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case and considering the arguments advanced by the parties, this Court deems it just and proper to suspend the sentence awarded to the applicant.

¶20

Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence awarded by the learned trial Court to the accused-applicant namely, Vishnu S/o Soranlal Sharma in Sessions Case No.14/2020 shall remain suspended during pendency of the appeal and he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- along with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this Court on 15.01.2026 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶22

YOGESH KUMAR /54

Vishnu S/O Soranlal Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vishnu S/O Soranlal Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bablu S/O Gainda Vs State of Rajasthan

Dharmendra S/O Ugraram Vs State of Rajasthan

Ruparam S/O Ramuram Vs the State

Rahul @ Bhola S/O Let. Bhimsingh Vs State of Rajasthan

Yashwant Kewat @ Raja S/O Shri Mahaveer Vs State of Rajasthan

Bantiram S/O Ramswaroop Vs State of Rajasthan