Para 22: Court dismisses suspension of sentence application noting that the State cannot waive statutory right of judicial custody while accused is in litigation.
Application dismissed; no leave granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S. B. Criminal Suspension of Sentence of Application No.
2519/2025
In
S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 3223/2025
Ruparam S/o Ramuram, Aged About 25 Years, Residence OfHaripura, Thana Jobner, District Jaipur
----Appellant
Versus
The State, Of Rajasthan
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Dinesh Pareek, Adv. Mr. Sarosh Khan, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order
10/12/2025
izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls /kkjk 430 ch-,u-,l-,l- ds varxZr izLrqr ltk LFkxu@tekur vkosnu ij nksuksa i{kksa dks lquk x;kA v/khuLFk fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds vkyksP; fu.kZ; ,oa i=koyh ij miyC/k dkuwuh o rF;kRed fLFkfr ij fopkj fd;k x;kA
izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky;] vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] pkSewa }kjk ls'ku izdj.k la[;k 09@2017 esa ikfjr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; fnukad 11-11-2025 ds ek/;e ls /kkjk 411 Hkk-na-la- esa nks"kfl) ?kksf"kr djrs gq, vf/kdre 02 o"kZ ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl dh ltk ls nafMr fd;k gSA
fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ dk fuosnu gS fd vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr funksZ"k gS rFkk mls izdj.k esa feF;k :i ls fyIr fd;k x;k gSA fopkj.k ds nkSjku vfHk;qDr&vihykFkhZ tekur ij Fkk rFkk orZeku esa fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk mldh ltk LFkfxr dh gqbZ gSA vihy ds
(2 of 2) [SOSA-2519/2025]
fuLrkj.k esa le; yxsxkA vUr esa ltk LFkfxr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us ltk LFkxu vkosnu dk fojks/k fd;kA lquk x;k ,oa leLr rF;ksa ij fopkj fd;k x;kA
pwafd fopkj.k ds nkSjku vfHk;qDr&vihykFkhZ tekur ij gksuk crk;k x;k gS rFkk orZeku esa Hkh fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk mldh ltk LFkfxr dh gqbZ gSA vihy ds fuLrkj.k esa le; yxsxkA
vr% izdj.k ds rF;ksa o ifjfLFkfr;ksa] fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ }kjk ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= ds leFkZu esa U;k;ky; ds le{k izLrqr fd;s x;s rdksZa] izLrqr vihy esa mBk;s x;s dkuwuh eqn~nksa vkfn dks /;ku esa j[krs gq,] xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr :ikjke iq= jkewjke bl U;k;ky; esa fnukad 13-01-2026 dks ,oa rRi'pkr tc Hkh mls vknsf'kr fd;k tkos] viuh mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk ca/ki= ,oa ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks tekursa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn izLrqr dj rLnhd djok ns rks og tekur ij vktkn jgs ,oa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; fnukafdr 11-11-2025 ds rgr n.Mkns'k dk fdz;kUo;u bl vihy ds vfUre fu.kZ; gksus rd LFkfxr j[kk tkosA
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
DINESH KUMAWAT /51
3 issues framed by the court
Whether suspension of sentence pending stay application is maintainable when the accused is currently held in judicial custody.
Whether relief of one-third leave and off-days can be granted to the appellant in favor of suspension.
Whether the impugned order granting suspension of sentence is liable to be set aside.
Ruparam S/o Ramuram
The State
UMA SHANKER VYAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
