Allowed

Rahul @ Bhola S/O Let. Bhimsingh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC15 Dec 2025CRLMB/16258/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application by an accused of attempted culpable homicide with three ordinary and one serious injuries; bail granted on furnishing personal bond and two sureties without expressing opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to furnish personal bond of Rs. 1 lakh and two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each; released on bail if no other case requires detention.

Rahul @ Bhola S/O Let. Bhimsingh Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:50456]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16258/2025

¶4

Rahul @ Bhola S/o Let. Bhimsingh, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Jakhrana Kalan, Police Statin Behror Sadar, District KotputliBehror. ( At Present Confined In Sub Jail Behror)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumer Singh Ola, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. O S Rajpurohit, PP Mr. Mohit Balwada, Adv.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶11

Judgment / Order

¶12

15/12/2025

¶13

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= ch ,u ,l ,l dh /kkjk 483 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk cgjksM lnj] ftyk dksViwryh cgjksM esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 178@2025 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 109¼1½] 115¼2½] 126¼2½] 351¼2½ ch ,u ,l esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA

¶14

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr funksZ"k gS] mls feF;k :i ls bl izdj.k esa vkfyIr fd;k x;k gSaA izdj.k esa ckn vuqla/kku vkjksi i= is'k gks pqdk gS] izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr fnukad 04-11-2025 ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] vfHk;qDr dk iwoZ dk dksbZ vkijkf/kd fjdksMZ ugha gS] izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vr% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd, tkus ,oa mls tekur ij fjgk fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA

¶15

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd o fo}ku vf/koDrk ifjoknh us izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k fd;k rFkk vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA

(2 of 2)

[2025:RJ-JP:50456]

[CRLMB-16258/2025]

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZ ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;k ,oa ekeys ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj fd;kA

¶20

orZeku ekeys esa vfHk;qDr ds fo:) vkgr ij tkuysok geyk dkfjr djus dk vkjksi gSA vkgr ds rhu lk/kkj.k o ,d xaHkhj izd`fr dh pksVsa vkbZ gSA

¶21

izdj.k esa miyC/k leLr rF;kRed fLFkfr rFkk izLrqr fd;s x;s rdksZa ,oa izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izdj.k ds bl izdze ij xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ jk; O;Dr fd, fcuk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶22

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr jkgqy mQZ Hkksyk iq= Lo- Hkheflag dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls ryc fd;k tkos] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`< ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr djs rFkk mldh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks rks mls vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosaA

¶23

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶24

Murari Lal Sharma /219

Rahul @ Bhola S/O Let. Bhimsingh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul @ Bhola S/O Let. Bhimsingh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bablu S/O Gainda Vs State of Rajasthan

Dharmendra S/O Ugraram Vs State of Rajasthan

Ruparam S/O Ramuram Vs the State

Vishnu S/O Soranlal Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Yashwant Kewat @ Raja S/O Shri Mahaveer Vs State of Rajasthan

Bantiram S/O Ramswaroop Vs State of Rajasthan