Disposed

Yogesh Vijay S/O Shri Devaki Nandan Vijay v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC9 Oct 2025CW/5106/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the petitioner to submit a representation regarding his suspension, which the respondents were to dispose of with a reasoned order within four weeks. The court granted liberty to approach again if aggrieved by the representation's outcome.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to submit representation; respondents directed to dispose within 4 weeks.

Yogesh Vijay S/O Shri Devaki Nandan Vijay… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:41239]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5106/2025

¶4

Yogesh Vijay S/o Shri Devaki Nandan Vijay, Aged About 55 Years, R/o 5060, Shivaji Colony, Chhawani Chouraha, Tonk (Raj.)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶8

1. District Collector, Tonk.

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.	Dharmendra Pareek
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	Umesh Choudhary for
	Mr.	V.D. Gathala,AGC

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN

¶12

Order

¶13

09/10/2025

¶14

Learned counsel for petitioner while placing reliance upon judgment in case of Ajay Kumar Choudhary Vs. Union of India Through Its Secretary and Another reported as AIR 2015 SC 2389 submits that present petitioner was placed under suspension vide order dated 11.05.2023 (Annexure 2) and petitioner is entitled to reinstatement pending inquiry. He further submits that the petitioner was suspended on false allegations and the allegations are not sufficient to warrant suspension in contemplation of enquiry. He further submitted that placing a public servant under suspension for a longer duration is also against the public policy.

[2025:RJ-JP:41239]

[CW-5106/2025]

(2 of 2)

Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned AGC and perused the judgment as referred by learned counsel for petitioner along with material on record.

¶19

Present petitioner, who was appointed as Land Records Inspector was suspended by the District Collector (Land Record) District Tonk (Annexure 2), on 11.05.2023.

¶20

Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to respondent No.2 within a period of two weeks raising all grounds. The respondents are directed to dispose of the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 4 weeks from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E- mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has right to re-approach the court with fresh petition.

¶21

Accordingly, the writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed.

¶22

(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J

¶23

GAURAV /79

Yogesh Vijay S/O Shri Devaki Nandan Vijay v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yogesh Vijay S/O Shri Devaki Nandan Vijay v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nandlal S/O Shri Ramchandra Vs the State of Rajasthan

Shankar Lal Saini S/O Late Shri Kajod Mal Saini Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohan Singh S/O Jal Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Monika W/O Sanjay Chaudhary Vs Rajasthan Public Service Commission

Prince Kumar Sharma Son of Shri Shyam Kumar Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Radheyshyam Son of Kajodi Vs the Superintendent of Police