Prahlad S/O Shri Shrawan Lal Vs Dinesh Soni S/O Mohan Lal — Rajasthan HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Prahlad S/O Shri Shrawan Lal Vs Dinesh Soni S/O Mohan Lal — Rajasthan HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

No substantive relief granted; with the aforesaid observations/directions the writ petition stands disposed of, along with the stay application and all pending applications, if any. The petitioners were directed to seek clarification/modification of the Board's order dated 25.10.2024 by filing an appropriate application with the Board of Revenue, to be decided after hearing all sides strictly in accordance with law.

Issue for consideration

Whether the Court should grant the petitioners' request for clarification/modification of the Board of Revenue's order dated 25.10.2024 (which directed the parties to maintain status quo over the site with regard to the way), and/or direct the Board to pass appropriate orders on the status quo.

Court's answer

If the petitioners want any clarification/modification in the impugned order dated 25.10.2024, it is expected from the petitioners to approach the Board by way of filing an appropriate application.

Ratio / Principle

Such application, if submitted by the petitioners, would be decided by the Board after hearing the arguments of all sides, strictly in accordance with law.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench (single Judge, Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand), by order dated 12/09/2025 disposed of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5068/2025 preferred by seven petitioners (Prahlad, Rampratap, Kanhaiya Lal, Gulab Bai, Manju Bai, Radhey Shyam and Hari Prasad) against Dinesh Soni and the State of Rajasthan (through Tehsildar Indergarh, District Bundi), aggrieved by the Board of Revenue's order dated 25.10.2024 directing the parties to maintain status quo over the site with regard to the way. The petitioners sought clarification/modification of that order and directions against the Board. In the considered opinion of the Court, any clarification/modification of the impugned order was to be sought from the Board itself: the petitioners were expected to approach the Board by way of filing an appropriate application, which the Board would decide after hearing the arguments of all sides, strictly in accordance with law. The writ petition, the stay application and all pending applications stand disposed of. No statute or precedent case was cited in the order.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5068/2025

Prahlad S/o Shri Shrawan Lal, R/o Nadi Bhavpura, Tehsil Indergarh, District Bundi.

Rampratap S/o Shri Shrawan Lal, R/o Nadi Bhavpura, Tehsil Indergarh, District Bundi.

Kanhaiya Lal S/o Shri Bhura, R/o Nadi Bhavpura, Tehsil Indergarh, District Bundi.

Gulab Bai W/o Shri Bhura, R/o Nadi Bhavpura, Tehsil Indergarh, District Bundi.

Manju Bai D/o Shri Bhura, R/o Nadi Bhavpura, Tehsil Indergarh, District Bundi.

Radhey Shyam S/o Shri Bhura, R/o Nadi Bhavpura, Tehsil Indergarh, District Bundi.

Hari Prasad S/o Shri Bhura, R/o Nadi Bhavpura, Tehsil Indergarh, District Bundi.

----Petitioners

Versus

Dinesh Soni S/o Mohan Lal, R/o Gandhipura, Lakheri, Tehsil Indergarh, District Bundi, Rajasthan.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Tehsildar Indergarh, District Buandi.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) :

JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND

Order

12/09/2025

Aggrieved by the order dated 25.10.2024 passed by the Board of Revenue (for short, ‘the Board’), the instant writ petition has been preferred.

[CW-5068/2025]

(2 of 2)

By passing the order impugned, the Board has directed the parties to maintain status quo over the site with regard to the way.

It appears that the petitioners are seeking clarification/modification of this order and is seeking directions against the Board to pass appropriate orders for directing the parties to maintain status quo.

In the considered opinion of this Court, in case, the petitioner wants any clarification/modification in the impugned order dated 25.10.2024, it is expected from the petitioners to approach the Board by way of filing appropriate application.

In case, such application is submitted by the petitioners, the same would be decided by the Board after hearing the arguments of all sides, strictly in accordance with law.

With the aforesaid observations/directions, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J

KuD/25