Dismissed¶18

Satya Narayan Sharma v. State

Rajasthan HC2 Jul 2025CW/2214/2001

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench; S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2214/2001; Satya Narayan Sharma v. State of Rajasthan (Department of Personnel); Hon'ble Mahendar Kumar Goyal, J.; decided 02/07/2025; dismissal for non-prosecution; counsel pleaded no instructions; repeated adjournments over years; final opportunity granted 22.04.2025 with bar on further adjournment; pending applications disposed of; no merits adjudicated; no statutes or precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

As learned counsel for the petitioner pleaded no instructions on the day fixed for argument, despite the final opportunity granted on 22.04.2025, the civil writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. ¶18

Satya Narayan Sharma Vs State — Rajasthan HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:24288]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2214/2001

¶4

Satya Narayan Sharma, aged about 45, Son of Late Shri Nathu Lal Sharma, House No. 1686, Gali of Shyam Nath Tiwari, Chaura Rasta, Jaipur -3

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State of Rajasthan through the Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Vishal Kumar for
	Mr. Amit Dadhich
For Respondent(s)	: Ms. Sweekriti Sharma for
	Mr. Archit Bohra,AGC

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order

¶11

02/07/2025

¶12

On last date, i.e., 22.04.2025, following order was passed:-

¶13

“On perusal of the order-sheets, in the instant case, it reflects that learned counsel for the petitioner has been taking adjournment for last so many years.

¶14

In the interest of justice, one more opportunity is granted to the petitioner to argue the matter.

¶15

It is made clear that no further adjournment shall be granted in this matter.

¶16

List this matter after two weeks.”

¶17

Today, learned counsel for the petitioner pleads no instructions.

¶18

In view thereof, this civil writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

¶19

(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J