Dismissed¶33

M/S Insecticides India Limited v. Vinod Singh S/O Shi Vijendra Singh Chauhan

Rajasthan HC1 Jul 2025CW/4882/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal of employer writ petitions (S.B. Civil Writ Petition Nos. 4882/2025, 5139/2025, 5140/2025) challenging pendency of claim proceedings before the Industrial Tribunal & Labour Court, Alwar; maintainability objections left to the Labour Court; no preemption by High Court; Vinod Singh v. M/s Insecticides India Limited; Ramesh Kumar and Anil Kumar v. Daikin; Justice Mahendar Kumar Goyal; decided 01/07/2025.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioners to make a request to the learned Labour Court to decide its objections raised as to maintainability of the claim petitions before proceeding further in the matter; pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. ¶33

M/S Insecticides India Limited Vs Vinod Singh S/O Shi Vijendra Singh Chauhan — Rajasthan HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶33

Issue for consideration

Whether the writ petitions seeking quashing of the proceedings pending before the learned Industrial Tribunal & Labour Court, Alwar could be entertained when the petitioners' objections to the maintainability of the claim petitions were themselves pending consideration before that court.

¶31

Court's answer

As the petitioners' objections regarding maintainability of the claim petitions were pending consideration before the learned Labour Court, the High Court did not consider it just and proper to preempt the Labour Court's consideration.

¶31

Ratio / Principle

The writ petitions were dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to make a request to the learned Labour Court to decide its objections raised as to maintainability of the claim petitions before proceeding further in the matter; pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.

¶33

Key takeaways

If any such request/application is made or filed, the learned Labour Court is expected to decide it expeditiously in accordance with the law.obiter¶34

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench), single Judge (Mahendar Kumar Goyal, J.), 01/07/2025 - Employers (M/s Insecticides India Limited; Manager, Daikin Airconditioning India Pvt. Ltd.; Manager, Daikin Air Conditioning Private Ltd.) filed S.B. Civil Writ Petitions Nos. 4882/2025, 5139/2025 and 5140/2025 seeking quashing of claim proceedings pending before the Industrial Tribunal & Labour Court, Alwar (LCR Nos.03/2021, 107/2018 and 47/2017). As the employers' objections to the maintainability of the claim petitions were themselves pending consideration before the Labour Court, the Court declined to preempt that consideration and dismissed the writ petitions with liberty to request the Labour Court to decide the maintainability objections before proceeding further, expeditiously and in accordance with law.

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:23936]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4882/2025

¶4

M/s Insecticides India Limited, E-442-443 M Riico Industrial Area Chopanki, Post Bhiwadi District Alwar (Raj.) Through Manager

¶5

M/s Insecticides India Limited Head Office, 401-402 Luso Tower Azadpur Commercial Complex Delhi-110033 Through Managing Director.

¶6

----Petitioners/non-claimants

¶7

Versus

¶8

Vinod Singh S/o Shi Vijendra Singh Chauhan, R/o Village Kulaana Tehsil And District Jhajjhar (Haryana)

¶9

----Respondent/Claimant

¶10

Connected With

¶11

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5139/2025

¶12

Manager, Daikin Airconditioning India Pvt. Ltd., Industrial Zone, Japanese Zone, Majara Kath, Industrial Zone, Neemrana, District- Alwar, Rajasthan.

¶13

----Petitioner/non-claimant

¶14

Versus

¶15

Ramesh Kumar S/o Shri Mahavir Bhambhi, Age 34 Years, R/o Village Post Banya, Tehsil Taranagar, District Churu, Rajasthan

¶16

----Respondent/Claimant

¶17

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5140/2025

¶18

Manager, Daikin Air Conditioning Private Ltd. Ricco Industrial Area Region, Majra Kath Neemrana District Alwar (Raj.)

¶19

----Petitioner/non-claimant

¶20

Versus

¶21

Anil Kumar S/o Shri Ved Prakash, R/o Village Salwan, Tehsil Asandh, District- Alwar, Rajasthan

¶22

----Respondent/Claimant

¶23

For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Pranjal Mundhra for Mr. Veyankatesh Garg For Respondent(s) :

(2 of 2)

[2025:RJ-JP:23936]

[CW-4882/2025]

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL

¶28

Judgment / Order

¶29

01/07/2025

¶30

These writ petitions are filed seeking a direction to quash the proceedings pending before the learned Industrial Tribunal & Labour Court, Alwar (for brevity “the learned Labour Court”) in LCR Nos.03/2021: Vinod Singh versus M/s Insecticides India Limited & Anr., 107/2018: Ramesh Kumar versus Manager, Daikin Airconditioning India Pvt. Ltd. & 47/2017: Anil Kumar versus Manager, Daikin Air Conditioning India Pvt. Ltd. respectively.

¶31

Indisputably, the objections raised by the petitioners in this regard before the learned Labour Court are pending consideration and in view thereof, this Court does not deem it just and proper to preempt the consideration by the learned Labour Court.

¶32

Confronted with the aforesaid situation, learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw these writ petitions with a liberty to make a request to the learned Labour Court to decide its objections raised as to maintainability of the claim petitions before proceeding further in the matter.

¶33

Accordingly, these writ petitions are dismissed with liberty as aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

¶34

It goes without saying that if any such request is made/application is filed, the learned Labour Court is expected to decide it expeditiously in accordance with the law.

¶35

(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J

¶36

Manish/s-213-215

M/S Insecticides India Limited v. Vinod Singh S/O Shi Vijendra Singh Chauhan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Insecticides India Limited v. Vinod Singh S/O Shi Vijendra Singh Chauhan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukesh Kumar Son of Shri Chetram Vs State of Rajasthan

Vikas Pareek S/O Deepak Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Vijay Sehra S/O Shri Prabhu Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Bheem Singh Son of Shri Raghunath Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Chetan Prakash Sharma S/O Sh. Suresh Chand Sharma Vs the State of Rajasthan

Shiv Charan Vs Assistant Engineer Gov of Raj