Writ petition challenged the Tribunal's rejection of a stay application in a pending reference against Jaipur Development Authority. The court declined to interfere but directed the Tribunal to dispose of the reference petition expeditiously, preferably within two months, uninfluenced by this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:48594]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18632/2025
----Petitioners
Versus
Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur, through The Secretary, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Solanki For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishabh Khandelwal
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA Order
01/12/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:48594]
[CW-18632/2025]
(2 of 2)
(SANDEEP TANEJA),J
AVINASH GULERIA /4
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the Tribunal's order rejecting the petitioners' stay application.
Whether the Tribunal should be directed to decide the reference petition within a time bound period.
Prabhunarayan S/o Late Shri Chotu Ram
Lala Ram S/o Late Shri Chotu Ram
Hanuman Sahay S/o Late Shri Chotu Ram
Gopal S/o Late Shri Rugha
Ramdayal S/o Late Shri Bodu Ram
Kamlesh S/o Late Shri Bodu Ram
Sandeep Taneja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
