Police constables sought relieving orders to join new postings. The court found the controversy covered by its earlier Arun Choudhary ruling and disposed of the petition accordingly.
Respondents directed to issue relieving orders to petitioners within one week enabling them to join new posting.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:41473]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15612/2025
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bajrang Sepat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Parth Sharma for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order
10/10/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:41473]
[CW-15612/2025]
(2 of 3)
[2025:RJ-JP:41473] (3 of 3)
[CW-15612/2025]
9 . Accordingly, the writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J
CHETNA BEHRANI /66
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to relieving orders to join their new place of posting in terms of the Arun Choudhary decision?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Arun Choudhary and Ors. Vs. State and Ors.Relied on
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5255/2013
Manisha Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.Relied on
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11557/2025
Mukesh Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.Referred
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15389/2025
Kishor Jatoliya
Shubham Vairagi
Bhomeshwar Prajapat
State of Rajasthan
Director General of Police
Inspector General of Police, Police Telecommunication
Ashok Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
