A writ petition by two petitioners against the State and RPSC was dismissed without controversion, following the ratio of an earlier decided petition on a similar factual matrix. Pending applications were also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:4910]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15434/2023
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raghunandan Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.F. Baig
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order
04/02/2025
Learned counsel for the respondent has relied upon the judgment passed in SBCWP No. 566/2021 titled as Bharat Rathore & Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. and has submitted that the said petition under akin factual matrix is dismissed.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has not controverted the aforementioned contentions.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed in light of the ratio encapsulated in Bharat Rathore & ors. (Supra). Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
ANIL SHARMA /404
1 issue framed by the court
Should this writ petition be dismissed in line with the earlier judgment in SBCWP No. 566/2021 involving an akin factual matrix?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Bharat Rathore & Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.Relied on
SBCWP No. 566/2021
Babulal Beniwal
Mahaveer Sharma
State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan Public Services Commission
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
