Petitioners complained of irregularities in tubewell works; enquiry covered only some tubewells. Court disposed of the writ with expectation that authorities conduct appropriate enquiry into all allegations and act per law after hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12971/2025
----Petitioners
Versus
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikash Meena
JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order
17/09/2025
[CW-12971/2025]
(2 of 2)
same, but so far as the complaint with regard to the other works undertaken at other tubewells, no enquiry has been conducted and no action has been taken against the delinquent officer. Learned counsel submits that, under the compelling circumstance, the petitioners have approached this Court seeking appropriate directions.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
Karan/59
1 issue framed by the court
Whether respondents must enquire into the petitioners' complaint regarding irregularities in tubewell works beyond the three tubewells already probed?
Rajendra
Rakesh
Barau
Viri Singh
State Of Rajasthan (through Principal Secretary, Rural Development and Panchayati Raj Department)
State Of Rajasthan (through CEO District Dholpur)
Anoop Kumar Dhand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
